Solved

Shadow Copy details, XP client

Posted on 2008-06-17
6
596 Views
Last Modified: 2012-06-27
I am running SBS 2003 and XP SP3.

A couple of questions came up as I was setting this up and reading about Shadow copy on this website:
http://www.sbs-rocks.com/Windows%20Server%20Hacks%20Excerpt.htm

1) Does SP3 already come with the shadow copy client?  I went to install the version of the client that I dled from microsoft, and it appeared to be already installed (gave me the option to uninstall)

2) On my XP machines, I am mounting a share at //Server/data where //Server is the server name and data is a share of a folder on the D: drive.  Is this going to cause problems as stated in the article?
The article states:
"Don't enable shadow copies on a volume that has mount points on it. A mount point (or mounted drive) is a special volume that is attached to an empty folder on an NTFS volume."  

3) I am using the server as it was formatted by Dell - a 25GB C drive for OS, ~690GB D for data.
How do I check and or change the cluster size so that it will not exhibit the problems listed in the traps section of this article?

"By default, on Windows Server 2003, any volumes larger than 2 GB will have a cluster size of only 4 KB, which is insufficient.
To solve this problem, when you format the volume, specify an allocation unit size of 16 KB instead using either Disk Management or the /a switch with the format command."

I've tested viewing old versions of a txt file on an XP box and so far so good...but I want 2 know if it will stay that way!

Thanks!
0
Comment
Question by:erkwong
  • 3
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:akirhol
ID: 21806800
1. Yes, VSS is a standard feature of all NT 5.1 installations
2. I don't believe so, the article is refering to having a drive partition mounted in a folder on another drive instead of it having it's own drive letter
3. You can check the cluster size by downloading this little applet from Microsoft called ntfsinfo, linked below. To change it, you would have to reformat your partitions.

ntfsinfo: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysinternals/fileanddisk/ntfsinfo.mspx
0
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:akirhol
ID: 21806815
Regarding ntfsinfo:

Extract it to a folder, say C:\Temp and run it with "ntfsinfo c:\"

It will spit out some information and what you are looking for of course is "bytes per cluster", the default for NTFS volumes, as mentioned by that article, is 4096.
0
 

Author Comment

by:erkwong
ID: 21808615
OK, i will try that applet.
I suppose it still is up for debate whether this 'trap' of shadow copies disappearing after defrag really exists?  I suppose, if I do not defrag and I backup before defrag, I should be OK even if I don't reformat w/ 16KB cluster size.  
0
NAS Cloud Backup Strategies

This article explains backup scenarios when using network storage. We review the so-called “3-2-1 strategy” and summarize the methods you can use to send NAS data to the cloud

 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:akirhol
ID: 21811820
If it's a defrag they are worried about, schedule the defrag to happen at the system's lowest point of utilization. That will mitigate the risk of losing a shadow copy that needs to be restored.
0
 

Author Comment

by:erkwong
ID: 21827146
How does one schedule the defrag times?
0
 
LVL 74

Accepted Solution

by:
Jeffrey Kane - TechSoEasy earned 250 total points
ID: 22586062
I realize this question is quite old, but thought I'd provide an answer anyhow just in case you haven't found one elsewhere.

It's not necessary at all to install the shadow copy client on workstations in an SBS environment as long as you joined them to the domain using http://<servername>/connectcomputer as recommended in the SBS documentation.  This is because the client is automatically installed on workstations joined in this manner.  If you didn't join the workstations correctly, you can fix that by following the steps I've outlined here:  http://sbsurl.com/rejoin

Then, SBS automatically enables VSS on your data partition for all network shares configured on that partition.  There is no need at all to modify the cluster size.  I do realize that the article suggests that increasing it to 16KB will avoid shadow copies being deleted during disk defrag, but honestly, I've rarely seen that happen, and the trade-off is that files take up much more space on your drive and backups than necessary.

Jeff
TechSoEasy
0

Featured Post

Portable, direct connect server access

The ATEN CV211 connects a laptop directly to any server allowing you instant access to perform data maintenance and local operations, for quick troubleshooting, updating, service and repair.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

The 6120xp switches seem to have a bug when you create a fiber port channel when you have a UCS fabric interconnects talking to them.  If you follow the Cisco guide for the UCS, the FC Port channel will never come up and it will say that there are n…
I’m often asked about newer and larger USB drives connected to SBS2008 and 2011 failing Windows Server Backup vs the older USB drives not failing. As disk space continues to grow and drive technology change SBS2008 and some SBS2011 end up with the f…
In an interesting question (https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/29008360/) here at Experts Exchange, a member asked how to split a single image into multiple images. The primary usage for this is to place many photographs on a flatbed scanner…

839 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question