Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 201
  • Last Modified:

DNS on secondary setup wrong

I am deploying a new server and it is going to be a secondary DNS server.  It has already been configured as a primary dns server.  When I attempt to delete the zone, it gives the warning that it is an AD integrated zone.  Server 18 is to be the primary DNS and Davis-RKP is to be the secondary.  If I delete the zones under the Davis-RKP server will it affect the zones under the Server18 server? (see attached pic)  Or can I just change the Zone Type under Davis-RKP from Integraded to Secondary.  

Thank you very much.
DNS.JPG
0
sjsell
Asked:
sjsell
  • 3
  • 3
2 Solutions
 
KCTSCommented:
Is there any reason that you are not using AD Integrated DNS?
This is much more efficient and allows you to have multiple primary DNS servers and i is a lot less hassle.
0
 
ocon827679Commented:
Are both of these servers domain controllers?  If so, why not leave them as AD Integrated.  The pros of AD Integrated certainly out weigh the cons.  There is no advantage to a secondary zone over and AD Integrated Primary.
0
 
sjsellAuthor Commented:
The book that I was reading made it sound like it can be bad to have multiple Primary DNS servers.  You should have one Primary and the rest should be secondary.  I plan on leaving server18 (what is our primary dns server) AD integrated.  I just wanted the Davis-RKP to be a secondary.  If I leave it as a primary, and I need to make a change to anything do I have to do it to all of the servers or can I just increment the serial number and it will replicate to the other DNS server?

Thanks for the amazingly fast reply.
0
VIDEO: THE CONCERTO CLOUD FOR HEALTHCARE

Modern healthcare requires a modern cloud. View this brief video to understand how the Concerto Cloud for Healthcare can help your organization.

 
KCTSCommented:
Not at all. AD Integrated DNS is more secure, integrates fully with Active Directory, if more efficient as it uses AD replication rather than relying on zone transfers and as it uses the multi-master model there is less latency as all servers can update each other. AD Integrated DNS should really be used as the default and you have to have a good reason not to use it, rather than justify its use.
0
 
sjsellAuthor Commented:
Thank you.  I will leave it as AD integrated then.  Let me make sure I understand updating it then.  If I update any of the DNS servers, it will replicate to any other AD integrated DNS server?  Do I need to increment the serial on the SOA on the server I am updating or will it do that automatically when I make a change?
0
 
KCTSCommented:
Make the change on any server and when replication occurs the other servers will be updated automatically - no need to do anything
0
 
sjsellAuthor Commented:
Wow. Thank you for your fast responses.  I've been toying with joining EE for a long time and this one had me stumped so I tried a trial.  I will be joining permanently now.  Thanks and expect a LOT of questions in the future.
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Path Explorer

An intuitive utility to help find the CSS path to UI elements on a webpage. These paths are used frequently in a variety of front-end development and QA automation tasks.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

  • 3
  • 3
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now