[Okta Webinar] Learn how to a build a cloud-first strategyRegister Now

x
?
Solved

DBCC DBREINDEX 20 Hours and counting....HELP!!

Posted on 2008-06-18
9
Medium Priority
?
1,249 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-01
I'm running SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition.  HP Proliant , Quad 3.6Mhz, 8GB RAM, RAID 5, 4 146GB 15k rotational speed drives.  The RAID controller died a week ago and I replaced it and everything came up without issue.  I could issue a query and get results.

Since the server has been back up, an insert into a 105 million row table of 1,000 records is taking 15 minutes.  It used to take 10 seconds.  I have detailed process logs that track the duration and in three years it's never taken more than 20 seconds.  Also, the weekly Backup Exec SQL "pre-process" never completed and I cancelled it at 35 hours.  It used to take 30 minutes.  Backup Exec is able to backup small (500MB) databases from the same server without issue.

I thought of corruption so I ran DBCC CHECKTABLE ('inv_detail', repair_fast) and it ran in 23 minutes and found no errors.  Since a reindex had not been done in a few months I started a DBCC DBREINDEX.  I wrongly assumed I would get status as it completed each index as the Book OnLine shows.  It does not.

I'm 20 hours into the reindex and if I'm only through the first index I need to stop and use another approach.  If I kill the process how long will the kill process take?  Will I leave thousands of pages marked as allocated wrongly?  How can I figure out what indecies are complete?  How can I stop and keep the indecies that are complete?

I am 3 days late on monthly invoicing already.  Not good.

THANKS !!
0
Comment
Question by:hammermedia
  • 6
  • 3
9 Comments
 
LVL 70

Expert Comment

by:Scott Pletcher
ID: 21817236
For one table, it's all going to be one transaction, I'm pretty sure, so if you KILL it the entire thing would have to roll back, which would likely take much longer than 20 hrs (i.e., than the time it took to do the rebuild itself).

Just to be sure, did you UPDATE STATISTICS on all the tables?  I would always try that first after any  kind of upgrade / service pack / media recovery, etc..
0
 

Author Comment

by:hammermedia
ID: 21817265
I didn't do UPDATE STATS because I understood that DBREINDEX updated the stats.  I thought I would be saving time.  Oops.
0
 
LVL 70

Expert Comment

by:Scott Pletcher
ID: 21817345
True; actually you are right, DBREINDEX will indeed update the stats.

You must have some other issue on the box for it to be that slow.  It might have something to do with disk I/O -- given the recent controller problems -- but you should check the SQL error logs for any kind of messages.

Also, run a profiler and/or performance monitor -- from a *different machine*, you don't want to add load to the already afflicted one -- and see if anything stands out: disk I/O queue, CPU usage, etc..

Just in case, although not likely at all, also make sure SQL does not a low "max memory" setting.
0
NEW Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows

Backup and recover physical and cloud-based servers and workstations, as well as endpoint devices that belong to remote users. Avoid downtime and data loss quickly and easily for Windows-based physical or public cloud-based workloads!

 

Author Comment

by:hammermedia
ID: 21817443
Max memory is at 6GB.  The disk queue length has been averaging 76 for hours.  Normally it's closer to zero.  CPU is at 3%.
0
 
LVL 70

Expert Comment

by:Scott Pletcher
ID: 21817720
Hmm, those numbers are all fine.

Did you check for SQL errors?  Also check for hardware errors, including all database drives used for SQL.
0
 

Author Comment

by:hammermedia
ID: 21818121
No hardware errors.  SQL Application messages that it grew the MDF by 5GB.  Drives are fine.  No errors in the HP management console either.
0
 

Author Comment

by:hammermedia
ID: 21821719
37 hours and still going.  Is there ANYWAY to get some status?  Never in a million years would I think a reindex would take sooo long after a CHECKDB completed in 23 minutes.
0
 

Author Comment

by:hammermedia
ID: 21827488
46 hours and it completed.  Just started running test to see if it actually fixed the original issue.  I'm starting that noe.
0
 

Accepted Solution

by:
hammermedia earned 0 total points
ID: 22227808
So the final result was reindex.  Once The reindex completed it was MUCH quicker doing the indexes again.  Now the ENTIRE index process takes 53 MINUTES.  Not HOURS !!!

I can't recommend highly enough to reindex once a week.  I have another 250 Million row table and it takes 5 hours to completely reindex it.

Reindexing is on the weekly schedule.
0

Featured Post

Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Recently we ran in to an issue while running some SQL jobs where we were trying to process the cubes.  We got an error saying failure stating 'NT SERVICE\SQLSERVERAGENT does not have access to Analysis Services. So this is a way to automate that wit…
Ready to get certified? Check out some courses that help you prepare for third-party exams.
Using examples as well as descriptions, and references to Books Online, show the documentation available for datatypes, explain the available data types and show how data can be passed into and out of variables.
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of configuring basic necessities in order to use the 2010 version of Data Protection Manager. These include storage, agents, and protection jobs. Launch Data Protection Manager from the deskt…

872 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question