Solved

Maximum number of regions n lines can dissect a plane

Posted on 2008-06-19
4
269 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-21
I want to find the maximum number of regions that n lines can dissect a plane into.
Let F(n) represent this number.

Through trial and error, I have found that:

F(0)=1
F(1)=2
F(2)=4
F(3)=7

From which I have found a pattern:

F(n) = n + F(n-1)  =>  F(n) = n(n+1)/2 + 1 .

This equation makes some sense, but (assuming that it's accurate for all n), how would I PROVE it to be true?
As all I've done so far, is throw some extrapolation on top of some trial-and-error. Hardly rigorous.

Is such a proof something which I'd be capable of 'getting'? Or, does it depend on some very high-level mathematics?

Thanks
0
Comment
Question by:InteractiveMind
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 53

Assisted Solution

by:Infinity08
Infinity08 earned 350 total points
ID: 21821475
Your formula is correct :

        http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PlaneDivisionbyLines.html
0
 
LVL 53

Accepted Solution

by:
Infinity08 earned 350 total points
ID: 21821480
Here's a proof by induction :

        http://www.jimloy.com/geometry/plane.htm

(no complicated maths ;) )
0
 
LVL 22

Assisted Solution

by:blu
blu earned 150 total points
ID: 21821653
You can always add a line that intersects all of the previous lines and does not pass through any previous point of intersection. Any line that is not parallel to any of the existing lines will pass through all of them. Thus, when adding the N+1 line, it will intersect with all of the previous N lines at exactly N points. Each of these N points is the endpoint of a line segment that bisects an existing region. If we consider the two regions bisected by the line after it no longer intersects any other lines, then as we follow the new line, each of the N intersection points adds one new region, plus the region left over when there is no more intersection points. Thus, for an existing plane with N lines, forming R(N) regions, adding one more line produces N+1 lines with R(N+!) regions, where R(N+1) = R(N) + N + 1. If we change that to a form in N, we get R(N) = N + F(N-1), which is what you had.

Is that sufficient? The conversion of the recurrence relation into a closed form just follows normal methods.
0
 
LVL 25

Author Closing Comment

by:InteractiveMind
ID: 31468733
Thanks
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Subnet Calculator

The subnet calculator helps you design networks by taking an IP address and network mask and returning information such as network, broadcast address, and host range.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Complex Numbers are funny things.  Many people have a basic understanding of them, some a more advanced.  The confusion usually arises when that pesky i (or j for Electrical Engineers) appears and understanding the meaning of a square root of a nega…
Lithium-ion batteries area cornerstone of today's portable electronic devices, and even though they are relied upon heavily, their chemistry and origin are not of common knowledge. This article is about a device on which every smartphone, laptop, an…
This is a video describing the growing solar energy use in Utah. This is a topic that greatly interests me and so I decided to produce a video about it.
Finds all prime numbers in a range requested and places them in a public primes() array. I've demostrated a template size of 30 (2 * 3 * 5) but larger templates can be built such 210  (2 * 3 * 5 * 7) or 2310  (2 * 3 * 5 * 7 * 11). The larger templa…

830 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question