Solved

Vista Business 2 GB vs 4GB

Posted on 2008-06-19
5
295 Views
Last Modified: 2012-06-27
We are purchasing some new desktops for our company and will be installing Vista Business SP1.  We need to run with 32 bit hardware and OS due to the limitiation of many of our 3rd party applications.  

I would like some feedback on the amount of RAM I should get for a std users.  I am thinking 2GB should be fine.   They will be running - Office 2007, Outlook, Symantec End Point Protection, web based browser apps, some small client server SQL apps.  Nothing really taxing, except for the occasional massive spreadsheet and powerpoint.  

Feedback on 2GB vs 4GB would be appreciated.   Cost does not play into the decision, strictly performance.  Is it going to make a difference or not?
0
Comment
Question by:FMAIntl
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
5 Comments
 

Expert Comment

by:Seedubya
ID: 21824525
3 Gb is where you want to go.  The exta gig will make quite a difference in performance.  Vista is very memory hungry.  4Gb is pointless since you're going 32 bit.

HTH

CW
0
 
LVL 17

Expert Comment

by:Andres Perales
ID: 21824541
Yes, it will make a difference...I would get them with 4 GB of RAM and Dual Core Processors...
0
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:Cedric_D
ID: 21824786
Please not forget to modify boot.ini with /3Gb switch, to let applications use memory over 2Gb.
0
 
LVL 6

Accepted Solution

by:
Jk387 earned 125 total points
ID: 21826427
Honestly, I tested Vista Buisness for a company when it first came out with 2GBs using all of the programs and types of programs you mentioned minus the Symantec Endpoint and it was definitly enough.  I have a Vista system I am on right now with 4GB's and the only reason i need the 4GBs is because i play games occasionally.  Obviously if price as you say is no object... the more the merrier so then go with 4GBs.  But if your looking to get the best bang for you buck than I think 2 will be just fine.  Also what peralesa mentioned about dual core as apposed to quad core is definitly a good suggestion.  You will get much better performance out of a higher clocked dual core than a lower clocked quad for what you are looking to do.  Good luck.
0
 

Author Comment

by:FMAIntl
ID: 21832988
Thanks!   I was curious about the processors as well!  Appreciate the input.
0

Featured Post

On Demand Webinar: Networking for the Cloud Era

Ready to improve network connectivity? Watch this webinar to learn how SD-WANs and a one-click instant connect tool can boost provisions, deployment, and management of your cloud connection.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

The main issue when installing Vista and XP in dual boot is when you have to reinstall any of the two when something fails, let's say a hard disk failure, a lost partition, virus, etc. What commonly happens is that you lose all your hard work config…
When you try to extract and to view the contents of a Microsoft Update Standalone Package (MSU) for Windows Vista, you cannot extract the files from the MSU. Here we are going to explain how to extract those hotfix details without using any third pa…
The Task Scheduler is a powerful tool that is built into Windows. It allows you to schedule tasks (actions) on a recurring basis, such as hourly, daily, weekly, monthly, at log on, at startup, on idle, etc. This video Micro Tutorial is a brief intro…
If you're a developer or IT admin, you’re probably tasked with managing multiple websites, servers, applications, and levels of security on a daily basis. While this can be extremely time consuming, it can also be frustrating when systems aren't wor…

734 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question