Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

Producing a generic correctly

Posted on 2008-06-22
6
Medium Priority
?
219 Views
Last Modified: 2010-03-30
Hi,

I've been having trouble with using generics the right way. I put together a complete example of what I wanted to do, which is below. My problem is that I kept trying to figure out a way for a generic class to produce an instance of the generic type 'internally', which just doesn't want to work without a cast and even that will produce a warning (though it does work). Here is my favorite barn example:



// Barn.java
import java.util.ArrayList;

public class Barn<TAnimal extends Animal>
{
    protected ArrayList<TAnimal> m_animals = new ArrayList<TAnimal>();
      
    protected FactoryAnimal m_factory;
   
    public Barn()
    {
    }
   
    public void addAnimal(TAnimal animal)
    {
          m_animals.add(animal);
    }
   
    public void setFactory(FactoryAnimal factory)
    {
          m_factory = factory;
    }
   
    public void magic()
    {
          // This won't work even though we know we were
          // initialized with a Horse type and that the factory
        // is actually producing a Horse instance.
          m_animals.add(m_factory.createAnimal());
    }
}


// Animal.java
public class Animal
{
      public Animal(){}
}


// Horse.java
public class Horse extends Animal
{
      public Horse(){}
}


// FactoryAnimal.java
public abstract class FactoryAnimal
{
      public abstract Animal createAnimal();
}


// FactoryHorse.java
public class FactoryHorse extends FactoryAnimal
{
      public FactoryHorse() {}
      
      public Animal createAnimal()
      {
            return new Horse();
      }
}


// Main driver class.
public class TestGenerics
{
      public static void main(String[] args)
      {
            Barn<Horse> barn = new Barn<Horse>();
            barn.setFactory(new FactoryHorse());
            
            // This won't work.
            barn.magic();
            
            // This is ok because 'outside' we know Barn
            // has been initialized with type Horse.
            barn.addAnimal(new Horse());
      }
}



Yeah so what I can do is use a cast like:

    m_animals.add((TAnimal)m_factory.createAnimal());

inside the Barn class but it will produce a warning and just doesn't look good.

Sorry if it seems like I keep going in circles with this stuff, I was hoping to make this little library as easy to use as possible, and believe my salvation lies within generics!

Thanks
0
Comment
Question by:DJ_AM_Juicebox
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 92

Accepted Solution

by:
objects earned 1200 total points
ID: 21842775
you can use a bit of reflection for that case, something like:

public class AnimalFactory<T extends Animal>
{
   private Class<T> clazz;

   public AnimalFactory( Class<T> c )
   {
       this.c = c;
   }

   public T createAnimal() throws Exception
   {
       return clazz.newInstance();
   }
}

0
 
LVL 13

Assisted Solution

by:Bart Cremers
Bart Cremers earned 800 total points
ID: 21844011
objects factory is a great solution. If you wanted, you could go for a factory method as well:

class TestGenerics {
 
    public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
        Barn<Horse> barn = new Barn<Horse>();
        barn.setFactory(new AnimalFactory<Horse>(Horse.class));
 
        // This won't work.
        barn.magic();
 
        // This is ok because 'outside' we know Barn
        // has been initialized with type Horse.
        barn.addAnimal(new Horse());
        
        barn.addAnimal(animalFactoryMethod(Horse.class));
    }
    
    private static <T extends Animal> T animalFactoryMethod(Class<T> clazz) throws Exception {
        return clazz.newInstance();
    }
}

Open in new window

0
 

Author Comment

by:DJ_AM_Juicebox
ID: 21862548
Hi guys,

Yeah that looks good, the only thing I wonder about that is that the factory can't create an instance of Horse with initial parameters, like:

     public class Horse
     {
          public Horse(int x, int y) {}
     }


     return clazz.newInstance();


then the clazz.newInstance() wouldn't work because there's no default no-parameter constructor, right? Just checking,

Thanks
0
Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
LVL 92

Expert Comment

by:objects
ID: 21862570
thats correct, that approach would require a default constructor
0
 

Author Comment

by:DJ_AM_Juicebox
ID: 21862576
ok thanks
0
 
LVL 13

Expert Comment

by:Bart Cremers
ID: 21862979
Not entirely, the requirement is that all animals should have the same constructor, or knowledge of these constructors need to be present in the factory.
class AnimalFactory<T extends Animal> {
 
    private Class<T> clazz;
 
    public AnimalFactory(Class<T> c) {
        this.clazz = c;
    }
 
    public T createAnimal(int x, int y) throws Exception {
        Constructor<T> tConstructor = clazz.getConstructor(int.class, int.class);
        return tConstructor.newInstance(x, y);
    }
}

Open in new window

0

Featured Post

How to Use the Help Bell

Need to boost the visibility of your question for solutions? Use the Experts Exchange Help Bell to confirm priority levels and contact subject-matter experts for question attention.  Check out this how-to article for more information.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Introduction This article is the first of three articles that explain why and how the Experts Exchange QA Team does test automation for our web site. This article explains our test automation goals. Then rationale is given for the tools we use to a…
In this post we will learn different types of Android Layout and some basics of an Android App.
Video by: Michael
Viewers learn about how to reduce the potential repetitiveness of coding in main by developing methods to perform specific tasks for their program. Additionally, objects are introduced for the purpose of learning how to call methods in Java. Define …
Viewers learn about the scanner class in this video and are introduced to receiving user input for their programs. Additionally, objects, conditional statements, and loops are used to help reinforce the concepts. Introduce Scanner class: Importing…
Suggested Courses

877 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question