?
Solved

Redhat GFS redundancy

Posted on 2008-06-22
4
Medium Priority
?
1,008 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-06
Hi there

Im looking into RedHat GFS as a filesystem for a research paper. I was wondering if anyone knew how redundancy is implemented in GFS? Ive been doing some reading up on it but all i can find is that journeling can do something to do with recoery of data and that when a node fails the data from the node is fenced so it doesnt get accesses until the node comes back online. Im really interested in if it provides some kind of mirroring or block based raid across the storage nodes to maintain avaliability of all parts of the filesystem in the event of a failure. Does anyone know if this is possible. If not how does GFS do its high avaliablity configurations and how can it allow fulfilment of a SLA?

Thanks
Luke
0
Comment
Question by:static-void
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
4 Comments
 
LVL 20

Accepted Solution

by:
Gns earned 2000 total points
ID: 21872901
AFAICT, without a proper SAN to "back things up", you can't have what you want (both a gnbd and drbd automatic failover/sync ... what others would call "networked mirroring":-).
With SAN equipment, the san would take care of the underlying mirroring.
RedHat should have some clustering docs on this.

Cheers
-- Glenn
0
 
LVL 8

Author Comment

by:static-void
ID: 21889159
Thanks Glenn
So basically what your saying is that in order to have redundancy it needs to be implemented at the block level IE use GFS arch over top of SAN arch and provide all failover and redundancy at that low level not at a high level GFS redundancy. The reason im asking is that we are looking at deploying a HPC cluster for research purposes at the university im at, this cluster is implemented using comodity hardware and we would like to implement a clustered filesystem running across the local drives running in the cluster nodes for storage. Were currently looking at writing some extra code for GlusterFS to improve performance and redundancy across the cluster for this type of application. Im doing some reasearch into what this would involve, and im looking at how other systems do redundancy as GlusterFS seems to have the same issues with redundancy where it relies on redundancy at the device level which on comodity hardware is obviously out of the question.
If you know of any other systems which would implement a clustered file system across a number of nodes and which do do some level of redundancy i would really like to hear about it :)

Thanks
Luke
0

Featured Post

Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

The article will include the best Data Recovery Tools along with their Features, Capabilities, and their Download Links. Hope you’ll enjoy it and will choose the one as required by you.
Windows Server 2003 introduced persistent Volume Shadow Copies and made 2003 a must-do upgrade.  Since then, it's been a must-implement feature for all servers doing any kind of file sharing.
This Micro Tutorial will teach you how to reformat your flash drive. Sometimes your flash drive may have issues carrying files so this will completely restore it to manufacturing settings. Make sure to backup all files before reformatting. This w…
How to Install VMware Tools in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4 (RHEL 6.4) Step-by-Step Tutorial
Suggested Courses

719 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question