Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

Redhat GFS redundancy

Posted on 2008-06-22
4
Medium Priority
?
1,019 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-06
Hi there

Im looking into RedHat GFS as a filesystem for a research paper. I was wondering if anyone knew how redundancy is implemented in GFS? Ive been doing some reading up on it but all i can find is that journeling can do something to do with recoery of data and that when a node fails the data from the node is fenced so it doesnt get accesses until the node comes back online. Im really interested in if it provides some kind of mirroring or block based raid across the storage nodes to maintain avaliability of all parts of the filesystem in the event of a failure. Does anyone know if this is possible. If not how does GFS do its high avaliablity configurations and how can it allow fulfilment of a SLA?

Thanks
Luke
0
Comment
Question by:static-void
4 Comments
 
LVL 20

Accepted Solution

by:
Gns earned 2000 total points
ID: 21872901
AFAICT, without a proper SAN to "back things up", you can't have what you want (both a gnbd and drbd automatic failover/sync ... what others would call "networked mirroring":-).
With SAN equipment, the san would take care of the underlying mirroring.
RedHat should have some clustering docs on this.

Cheers
-- Glenn
0
 
LVL 8

Author Comment

by:static-void
ID: 21889159
Thanks Glenn
So basically what your saying is that in order to have redundancy it needs to be implemented at the block level IE use GFS arch over top of SAN arch and provide all failover and redundancy at that low level not at a high level GFS redundancy. The reason im asking is that we are looking at deploying a HPC cluster for research purposes at the university im at, this cluster is implemented using comodity hardware and we would like to implement a clustered filesystem running across the local drives running in the cluster nodes for storage. Were currently looking at writing some extra code for GlusterFS to improve performance and redundancy across the cluster for this type of application. Im doing some reasearch into what this would involve, and im looking at how other systems do redundancy as GlusterFS seems to have the same issues with redundancy where it relies on redundancy at the device level which on comodity hardware is obviously out of the question.
If you know of any other systems which would implement a clustered file system across a number of nodes and which do do some level of redundancy i would really like to hear about it :)

Thanks
Luke
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: IP Lookup

Get more info about an IP address or domain name, such as organization, abuse contacts and geolocation.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Is your phone running out of space to hold pictures?  This article will show you quick tips on how to solve this problem.
Compliance and data security require steps be taken to prevent unauthorized users from copying data.  Here's one method to prevent data theft via USB drives (and writable optical media).
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of installing the necessary services and then configuring a Windows Server 2012 system as an iSCSI target. To install the necessary roles, go to Server Manager, and select Add Roles and Featu…
How to Install VMware Tools in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4 (RHEL 6.4) Step-by-Step Tutorial
Suggested Courses

926 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question