Solved

Redhat GFS redundancy

Posted on 2008-06-22
4
949 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-06
Hi there

Im looking into RedHat GFS as a filesystem for a research paper. I was wondering if anyone knew how redundancy is implemented in GFS? Ive been doing some reading up on it but all i can find is that journeling can do something to do with recoery of data and that when a node fails the data from the node is fenced so it doesnt get accesses until the node comes back online. Im really interested in if it provides some kind of mirroring or block based raid across the storage nodes to maintain avaliability of all parts of the filesystem in the event of a failure. Does anyone know if this is possible. If not how does GFS do its high avaliablity configurations and how can it allow fulfilment of a SLA?

Thanks
Luke
0
Comment
Question by:static-void
4 Comments
 
LVL 20

Accepted Solution

by:
Gns earned 500 total points
ID: 21872901
AFAICT, without a proper SAN to "back things up", you can't have what you want (both a gnbd and drbd automatic failover/sync ... what others would call "networked mirroring":-).
With SAN equipment, the san would take care of the underlying mirroring.
RedHat should have some clustering docs on this.

Cheers
-- Glenn
0
 
LVL 8

Author Comment

by:static-void
ID: 21889159
Thanks Glenn
So basically what your saying is that in order to have redundancy it needs to be implemented at the block level IE use GFS arch over top of SAN arch and provide all failover and redundancy at that low level not at a high level GFS redundancy. The reason im asking is that we are looking at deploying a HPC cluster for research purposes at the university im at, this cluster is implemented using comodity hardware and we would like to implement a clustered filesystem running across the local drives running in the cluster nodes for storage. Were currently looking at writing some extra code for GlusterFS to improve performance and redundancy across the cluster for this type of application. Im doing some reasearch into what this would involve, and im looking at how other systems do redundancy as GlusterFS seems to have the same issues with redundancy where it relies on redundancy at the device level which on comodity hardware is obviously out of the question.
If you know of any other systems which would implement a clustered file system across a number of nodes and which do do some level of redundancy i would really like to hear about it :)

Thanks
Luke
0

Featured Post

How your wiki can always stay up-to-date

Quip doubles as a “living” wiki and a project management tool that evolves with your organization. As you finish projects in Quip, the work remains, easily accessible to all team members, new and old.
- Increase transparency
- Onboard new hires faster
- Access from mobile/offline

Join & Write a Comment

Having issues meeting security compliance criteria because of those pesky USB drives? Then I can help you! This article will explain how to disable USB Mass Storage devices in Windows Server 2008 R2.
How to update Firmware and Bios in Dell Equalogic PS6000 Arrays and Hard Disks firmware update.
This video teaches viewers how to encrypt an external drive that requires a password to read and edit the drive. All tasks are done in Disk Utility. Plug in the external drive you wish to encrypt: Make sure all previous data on the drive has been …
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of installing the necessary services and then configuring a Windows Server 2012 system as an iSCSI target. To install the necessary roles, go to Server Manager, and select Add Roles and Featu…

747 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

10 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now