Still celebrating National IT Professionals Day with 3 months of free Premium Membership. Use Code ITDAY17

x
?
Solved

Add additional IP network

Posted on 2008-09-29
3
Medium Priority
?
201 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-02
I have a 10.1.1.0 network, i have the need to have another such as 10.1.2.0, can I simply change my subnet mask from 255.255.255.0 to 255.255.0.0 and the two networks will talk?

Also where all do i have to change the subnet mask?  router, firewall, swithes, dhcp server?
0
Comment
Question by:jrri
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 58

Expert Comment

by:tigermatt
ID: 22599016
Yes. A bitmask of 255.255.0.0 will be more than ample to get those two networks to talk.

The subnet mask needs to be changed everywhere. Anything which has a static IP address needs the bitmask changing, and you can then update it in the DHCP Server scope so that dynamically assigned clients pull the new bitmask through DHCP automatically.

-tigermatt
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:jrri
ID: 22599082
Are there any issues that may bite me or is it prett clean?

Mike
0
 
LVL 58

Accepted Solution

by:
tigermatt earned 1400 total points
ID: 22599887
The only potential issues are the actual switch over stage from the old bitmask to the new bitmask. Your servers will obviously need a restart before they will re-register and communicate with each other again.

You do have an alternative. You can keep both networks with a subnet of 255.255.255.0, but configure the router with a different subnet. This technique is known as Variable Length Subnet Masking (VLSM) and it is quite common on larger networks. I am using it here at home right at this point in time.

Essentially you keep both subnets as 255.255.255.0 as I already said, but set the router to something like 255.255.0.0 as the bitmask. This means the router can then communicate across both the networks. The only difference is any traffic destined for the 10.1.2.0 network would need to pass through the router, but I consider this a minor inconvenience compared with doing a bitmask change across your whole site.

Each subnet will appear as a different subnet in its entirety. Netbios Browsing, for example, will not work, because it is restricted to a specified subnet. That is the only other downside I can think of to this approach.

-tigermatt
0

Featured Post

Moving data to the cloud? Find out if you’re ready

Before moving to the cloud, it is important to carefully define your db needs, plan for the migration & understand prod. environment. This wp explains how to define what you need from a cloud provider, plan for the migration & what putting a cloud solution into practice entails.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

When it comes to security, there are always trade-offs between security and convenience/ease of administration. This article examines some of the main pros and cons of using key authentication vs password authentication for hosting an SFTP server.
This program is used to assist in finding and resolving common problems with wireless connections.
Get a first impression of how PRTG looks and learn how it works.   This video is a short introduction to PRTG, as an initial overview or as a quick start for new PRTG users.
Monitoring a network: why having a policy is the best policy? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the enormous benefits of having a policy-based approach when monitoring medium and large networks. Software utilized in this v…

704 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question