Solved

Is it better to have managed switces in a chain or a loop?

Posted on 2008-10-01
5
179 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-05
Hi,

My company wants to install 6 managed switches om different floors connected via fiber modules. We already have the fiber panels in place, so it is just a matter af connecting the switches. I want to know if it is better to have them in a loop or a chain. The latter will spare us having to buy two extra gigabit fiber transceiver modules and cable for them to complete the loop. The switch which will have the servers on it will be in the basement, which means at the end of the chain, not in the middle.

Thank you!
0
Comment
Question by:rookie_b
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
5 Comments
 
LVL 43

Accepted Solution

by:
JFrederick29 earned 400 total points
ID: 22613223
If you chain the switches and a switch fails in the middle, connectivity to the servers is lost for the devices connected to the failed switch as well as the switches "above" the switch that failed.  A loop or ring configuration at least mitigates this scenario as there is an alternate path to reach the servers.  It is your decision to weigh cost versus network availability.
0
 
LVL 21

Assisted Solution

by:from_exp
from_exp earned 100 total points
ID: 22613238
loop provides additional redundancy, but spanning tree should be enabled to maintain logical loop free topology
0
 
LVL 43

Expert Comment

by:JFrederick29
ID: 22613258
Good point from_exp...

I assumed you would be using switches with Spanning Tree enabled.  If using switches that don't run Spanning Tree, you can't loop the switches.
0
 
LVL 43

Expert Comment

by:JFrederick29
ID: 22613275
If running non-spanning tree capable switches, I would suggest configuring the switches in a star topology meaning plug all the floor switches directly into the switch connected to the servers.  This is assuming that if the server switch (and servers) are down, there is no point in having communication between clients.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:rookie_b
ID: 31501914
THank you guys. This is exactly what I needed.

Cheers!
0

Featured Post

Get 15 Days FREE Full-Featured Trial

Benefit from a mission critical IT monitoring with Monitis Premium or get it FREE for your entry level monitoring needs.
-Over 200,000 users
-More than 300,000 websites monitored
-Used in 197 countries
-Recommended by 98% of users

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This tutorial will go through the steps required to write a script that will back up the configuration settings of a HP-ProCurve switch. You will need to get the following things to follow this tutorial: Telnet Scripting Tool e.g. TST10.exe …
#Citrix #Netscaler #MSSQL #Load Balance
NetCrunch network monitor is a highly extensive platform for network monitoring and alert generation. In this video you'll see a live demo of NetCrunch with most notable features explained in a walk-through manner. You'll also get to know the philos…
Michael from AdRem Software explains how to view the most utilized and worst performing nodes in your network, by accessing the Top Charts view in NetCrunch network monitor (https://www.adremsoft.com/). Top Charts is a view in which you can set seve…

690 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question