Solved

WSUS falsely reporting computer statistics

Posted on 2008-10-01
3
328 Views
Last Modified: 2012-06-21
In the colored pie charts and in the reports, WSUS is reporting computers as not having updates installed when all 'Approved' updates are installed.

For instance in the image below, you see that the computer is reporting that 25 updates have yet to be installed.
After drilling down to see what the 25 updates are, I find out that the updates that it thinks the computer needs have not yet been set as 'Approved' updates. They still list as 'Not Approved'.

Further more, these are not 'Critical' or 'Security' updates as you might think. All of those get pre-approved by the automatic approval process. There are 'Feature Packs', 'Service Packs', 'Updates' and 'Update Rollups' that I have yet to manually approve.

Any ideas on how to change this to report correctly, or is WSUS just designed to work incorrectly?
pie.png
0
Comment
Question by:corphealth
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 51

Expert Comment

by:Netman66
ID: 22630144
Run the server cleanup wizard and rerun the report.

Sometimes superceded updates show up as Not Installed or Not Approved once the newer patch arrives.

Let us know.

0
 

Accepted Solution

by:
corphealth earned 0 total points
ID: 22634356
Yeah, Ive done that. I think what is going on is that when the server says it "Needs" and update, its really just saying that the update is Microsoft recommended. I wish there were a way to change that to report needed updates as only Critical and Security.
For instance, one of those 25 updates that it is requesting is XP SP3 which we have yet to test on our network so we aren't going to deploy it yet. But SP3 isn't a Critical or Security update. Its a service pack...
I'm starting to assume that the server is working as it should, and If i don't want it to report those other types of updates as being "needed" then I need to not sync them. But i want to sync them because there might be an update here or there in one of the other categories that I actually want to push out.
0
 
LVL 51

Expert Comment

by:Netman66
ID: 22634510
I think you're likely correct.

I see this behaviour on our server all the time.  I've grown used to seeing every computer at less than 100% - which IMHO is training me to ignore computers less than 100% and will eventually cause me to ignore something I shouldn't.  It's not at all optimal.

0

Featured Post

Comprehensive Backup Solutions for Microsoft

Acronis protects the complete Microsoft technology stack: Windows Server, Windows PC, laptop and Surface data; Microsoft business applications; Microsoft Hyper-V; Azure VMs; Microsoft Windows Server 2016; Microsoft Exchange 2016 and SQL Server 2016.

Join & Write a Comment

So you have two Windows Servers and you have a directory/folder/files on one that you'd like to mirror to the other?  You don't really want to deal with DFS or a 3rd party solution like Doubletake. You can use Robocopy from the Windows Server 200…
Recently, I had the need to build a standalone system to run a point-of-sale system. I’m running this on a low-voltage Atom processor, so I wanted a light-weight operating system, but still needed Windows. I chose to use Microsoft Windows Server 200…
Here's a very brief overview of the methods PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg) offers for monitoring bandwidth, to help you decide which methods you´d like to investigate in more detail.  The methods are covered in more detail in o…
This video shows how to remove a single email address from the Outlook 2010 Auto Suggestion memory. NOTE: For Outlook 2016 and 2013 perform the exact same steps. Open a new email: Click the New email button in Outlook. Start typing the address: …

762 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

20 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now