?
Solved

volatile keyword in java 1.3

Posted on 2008-10-02
6
Medium Priority
?
580 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-05
Hi,

Does the volatile keyword make a primitive safe to read/write from multiple threads without guarding it? I don't know where I read that but - something like:

public class Test
{
    public volatile m_flag;

    new Thread() {
        public void run() {
            while(...) {
                m_flag = false;
                print(m_flag);
            }
        }
    }.start();

    new Thread() {
        public void run() {
            while(...) {
                m_flag = true;
                print(m_flag);
            }
        }
    }.start();
}

I mean is setting and getting m_flag atomic now, so no thread is reading or writing it at the same time? I can put a guard object around it but it seems annoying to do for a simple boolean primitive,

Thanks
0
Comment
Question by:DJ_AM_Juicebox
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 8

Expert Comment

by:mnrz
ID: 22627536
no I think  this is not safe, you had better to change it into this line:

private volatile java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean m_flag = false;

atomic types make your variable safe in read/write concurrently
0
 
LVL 8

Expert Comment

by:mnrz
ID: 22627545

private volatile java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean m_flag = false;

Open in new window

0
 
LVL 9

Expert Comment

by:mbodewes
ID: 22627896
mnrz: java.util.concurrent is not available to 1.3 as far as I know. Has this changed?
0
Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
LVL 9

Accepted Solution

by:
mbodewes earned 2000 total points
ID: 22627973
No, this does not work, the change may happen in between the setting and the printing. So the print statement may print about anything. There is nothing locking the volatile variable between these two states. You might want to synchronize the code parts setting and printing the variable instead.
0
 
LVL 8

Expert Comment

by:mnrz
ID: 22631793
yes in version 1.3 you need to synchronize it
0
 

Author Comment

by:DJ_AM_Juicebox
ID: 22650055
ok thanks
0

Featured Post

Get 15 Days FREE Full-Featured Trial

Benefit from a mission critical IT monitoring with Monitis Premium or get it FREE for your entry level monitoring needs.
-Over 200,000 users
-More than 300,000 websites monitored
-Used in 197 countries
-Recommended by 98% of users

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

By the end of 1980s, object oriented programming using languages like C++, Simula69 and ObjectPascal gained momentum. It looked like programmers finally found the perfect language. C++ successfully combined the object oriented principles of Simula w…
Java functions are among the best things for programmers to work with as Java sites can be very easy to read and prepare. Java especially simplifies many processes in the coding industry as it helps integrate many forms of technology and different d…
Viewers will learn about the regular for loop in Java and how to use it. Definition: Break the for loop down into 3 parts: Syntax when using for loops: Example using a for loop:
This video teaches viewers about errors in exception handling.
Suggested Courses
Course of the Month11 days, 20 hours left to enroll

752 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question