Solved

What is the purpose of an Anchor Controller?

Posted on 2008-10-04
5
2,268 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-12
Hi Experts,

I'm fairly good with Cisco wireless LWAPP and autonomous. Can someone tell me the purpose of having an Anchor Controller for Guest access?
0
Comment
Question by:typertec
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 12

Expert Comment

by:Pugglewuggle
ID: 22642999
This basically separates the functions of the guest WVLAN from the main corporate WVLAN. In this way, statistics for guest traffic and data for threat analysis can be gathered separately.
That's about it! Any questions?
Cheers!
0
 

Author Comment

by:typertec
ID: 22643119
Couldn't that also be accomplished by making a separate mobility group for guest, have them on a separate subnet...then have a route map to route that subnet out?
0
 
LVL 12

Accepted Solution

by:
Pugglewuggle earned 350 total points
ID: 22643153
That yes it could and it would work just fine - however an anchor controller is specifically for providing guest access in the same mobility group.
Here's a Cisco FAQ on how to use anchor controllers for guest access
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6366/products_qanda_item09186a00809ba482.shtml#qa17
Cheers!
0
 

Author Comment

by:typertec
ID: 22684408
Thanks for the link. I have a 6500 with a WLSM as the controller. There are multiple mobility groups, one being set for guest. Would the wlsm then be considered the anchor controller even though it's the controller for the other mobility groups? From the AP, guest traffic gets tunneled to the WLSM and from there it gets routed to the BBSM via a routemap. I'm not sure what the purposes of routing it to the BBSM is for.
0
 
LVL 12

Expert Comment

by:Pugglewuggle
ID: 22684811
Aaaahhh very nice, that's a nice card.
I suppose then that it does act as a "virtual" anchor controller, but a true anchor controller is actually a separate device altogether - this is done to completely isolate guest traffic from the main network.
I personally probably wouldn't worry about using an anchor controller... it seems to me that it's just one of Cisco's ploys to sell some expensive unnecessary equipment.
As far as the BBSM, I don't see the purpose either.
Cheers!
0

Featured Post

Online Training Solution

Drastically shorten your training time with WalkMe's advanced online training solution that Guides your trainees to action. Forget about retraining and skyrocket knowledge retention rates.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Need WiFi? Often, there are perfectly good networks that don't have WiFi capability - and there's a need to add it.  - Perhaps you have an Ethernet port into a network but no WiFi nearby. - Perhaps you have a powerline extender and no WiFi at the…
DECT technology has become a popular standard for wireless voice communication. DECT devices are not likely to be affected by other electronic devices and signals because they operate in a separate frequency-band.
This Micro Tutorial will show you how to maximize your wireless card to its maximum capability. This will be demonstrated using Intel(R) Centrino(R) Wireless-N 2230 wireless card on Windows 8 operating system.
Viewers will learn how to connect to a wireless network using the network security key. They will also learn how to access the IP address and DNS server for connections that must be done manually. After setting up a router, find the network security…

626 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question