Key features:
- Total Pages Views and Load times
- Top Pages Viewed and Load Times
- Real Time Site Page Build Performance
- Users’ Browser and Platform Performance
- Geographic User Breakdown
- And more
COURSE of the MONTH
9 days, 18 hours left to enrollBecome a Premium Member and unlock a new, free course in leading technologies each month.
Solved
Windows XP - maximum RAM?
Posted on 2008-10-06
I have a box running Windows XP Professional (32 bit) with 3Gb RAM. I've read some reports stating that 3Gb is the maximum that XP can use and others stating that it's 4Gb, possibly with extra switches in boot.ini. I've installed an extra 1Gb (4Gb total) but only 3gb shows up in system properties. Is it correct to say I'm not getting the benefit of this extra 1Gb and might as well remove it?
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange
Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.
- Help others & share knowledge
- Earn cash & points
- Learn & ask questions
3
2
- +3
9 Comments
You will only get 3.5 total since you have memory allocated for other things (video cards, sound cards, etc.) It is safe to say that with XP you will not even get close to using that 3 G even with very resource extensive apps. I would remove it and use it in another box that needs it.
You are getting the benefit of the extra Gig by allowing system components to allocate more memory. Now you won't see the 4 GB within the system properties but it is getting used which is freeing up other memory that would be used for the system components.
Is it correct to say I'm not getting the benefit of this extra 1Gb and might as well remove it?
For all practical purposes, yes, you are correct. You can evaluate the 4G Ram tuning instructions to see if you might fall into a scenario where it would be helpful, but for everyday computing your system just wont use it.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/
For all practical purposes, yes, you are correct. You can evaluate the 4G Ram tuning instructions to see if you might fall into a scenario where it would be helpful, but for everyday computing your system just wont use it.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/
All 32bit operating systems can in theory address 4Gb or memory - the trouble is that Windows needs to use some of that 4Gb to address other stuff such as the PCI bus making the max memory that can be utilised a little over 3Gb (if usually varies between about 3.2 and 3.Gb. and you will not get any more.
Windows Server 2003 Enterprise server can use the /PAE switch in boot.ini to use a software based 36bit addressing mode so it can ustilise more RAM - but this option is not available with XP.
So to answer the question directly - it is likely that you are utilising less than 25% of the last Gb of RAM - if you remove it then there will be a slight loss of avaibale ram - but not much.
Windows Server 2003 Enterprise server can use the /PAE switch in boot.ini to use a software based 36bit addressing mode so it can ustilise more RAM - but this option is not available with XP.
So to answer the question directly - it is likely that you are utilising less than 25% of the last Gb of RAM - if you remove it then there will be a slight loss of avaibale ram - but not much.
[boot loader]
timeout=30
default=multi(0)disk(0)rdi
[operating systems]
multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)par
I suggest the /3GB switch. It limits the kernel to 1GB and allows the rest to programs. /PAE splits it down the middle. The kernel doesn't need that much ram.
--------------------------
timeout=30
default=multi(0)disk(0)rdi
[operating systems]
multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)par
I suggest the /3GB switch. It limits the kernel to 1GB and allows the rest to programs. /PAE splits it down the middle. The kernel doesn't need that much ram.
--------------------------
Interesting. I was referring to this Microsoft Article. http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/server/PAE/PAEmem.mspx
Featured Post
Acronis protects the complete Microsoft technology stack: Windows Server, Windows PC, laptop and Surface data; Microsoft business applications; Microsoft Hyper-V; Azure VMs; Microsoft Windows Server 2016; Microsoft Exchange 2016 and SQL Server 2016.
Question has a verified solution.
If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question
I have purchased two new systems and both are now Universal Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) based. UEFI is replacing BIOS for the desktop PC. It is a Linux based firmware with enough robustness it can communicate with a website without loading …
On Beyond Tools
A conversation I recently had with the DevOps manager of a major online retailer really made me think about DevOps monitoring tools (https://www.onpage.com/devops-incident-management-tool/). The manager and I discussed how sever…
This video Micro Tutorial explains how to clone a hard drive using a commercial software product for Windows systems called Casper from Future Systems Solutions (FSS). Cloning makes an exact, complete copy of one hard disk drive (HDD) onto another d…
- Microsoft Legacy OS
- Storage
- Storage Software
- Windows OS
- Storage Hardware
- Windows 10, Windows Vista, Windows 8, Windows 7, *Disk Cloning
In this video, we discuss why the need for additional vertical screen space has become more important in recent years, namely, due to the transition in the marketplace of 4x3 computer screens to 16x9 and 16x10 screens (so-called widescreen format). …
- Microsoft Legacy OS
- Windows 10
- Windows 8
- Windows OS
- Windows 7
- Windows Vista, Windows XP, Windows 2000
Suggested Courses
Course of the Month9 days, 18 hours left to enroll
762 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.
Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.