Solved

Is the following solution for pairwise disjointment correct?

Posted on 2008-10-06
5
1,000 Views
Last Modified: 2012-08-14
Experts,

Below I have the following grammer and needed to perform pairwise disjointment. From what I understand I need to calculate the first sets. For each rule find each first letter could be in a
string and use that rule. A sing non-terminal should not have two rules that start
with the same terminal.

Do I have the following correct? And is the fix correct?
A - aB | b | cBB

B -aB |bA |aBb

C- aaA |b|caB

 


 

A= a|b|c

B=a|b|a    **not acceptable

C=a|b|c

 

To Fix:

B = aY

Y=B|Bb
0
Comment
Question by:missymadi
  • 3
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 45

Expert Comment

by:sunnycoder
ID: 22651272
> pairwise disjointment.
Can you explain in more detail what you are trying to achieve? This is the first time I heard that term :)

Are you trying to construct a CFG or a regular grammar or something else? What is the language supposed to express?
0
 

Author Comment

by:missymadi
ID: 22651389
For example:
<S> ::= <A> a <B> b
<A> ::= <A> b | b
<B> ::= a <B> | a

S- there would be no conflict because <S> only has one rule for associated with it. However, look at <A> there is a potential infinite loop.

I was wondering if I'm understanding this correctly by my previous question and answer.

Thanks, MissyMadi
0
 
LVL 45

Expert Comment

by:sunnycoder
ID: 22651543
1.
Ummm ... if you successfully remove the infinite loop, wont you change the language?
e.g.
<S> ::= <A> a <B> b
<A> ::= <A> b | b
<B> ::= a <B> | a

This would accept    bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbaab
In fact you can add infinite number of b to the string of b and it can still be expressed by the grammar. However, if you remove the loop, you would not be able to express strings like one above.

2.
To Fix:

B = aY

Y=B|Bb

You have not removed the loop but simply spread it over two statements ...

B = aY = aB = aaY = aaB = aaaY ...

This most likely is part of some course that you are taking. If you can give me exact problem statement, may be I can help you better.
0
 

Author Comment

by:missymadi
ID: 22652340
Yes, this is one of the question from the course book that stumped me.

Here's the question:
Perform the pairwise disjointness test for the following grammer rules
a. A - aB | b | cBB

b. B -aB |bA |aBb

c. C- aaA |b|caB
0
 
LVL 45

Accepted Solution

by:
sunnycoder earned 125 total points
ID: 22670998
Okay .. you are essentially performing the test to identify left recursive grammars.

You are correct in saying that a and c are fine and b fails the test - even though it is not left recursive. Look closely you can change the grammar by adding a followset for combining first and third rule (for B) that would give you unique first set for B

0

Featured Post

Is Your Active Directory as Secure as You Think?

More than 75% of all records are compromised because of the loss or theft of a privileged credential. Experts have been exploring Active Directory infrastructure to identify key threats and establish best practices for keeping data safe. Attend this month’s webinar to learn more.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

One of Google's most recent algorithm changes affecting local searches is entitled "The Pigeon Update." This update has dramatically enhanced search inquires for the keyword "Yelp." Google searches with the word "Yelp" included will now yield Yelp a…
Prime numbers are natural numbers greater than 1 that have only two divisors (the number itself and 1). By “divisible” we mean dividend % divisor = 0 (% indicates MODULAR. It gives the reminder of a division operation). We’ll follow multiple approac…
This is used to tweak the memory usage for your computer, it is used for servers more so than workstations but just be careful editing registry settings as it may cause irreversible results. I hold no responsibility for anything you do to the regist…
Learn how to create flexible layouts using relative units in CSS.  New relative units added in CSS3 include vw(viewports width), vh(viewports height), vmin(minimum of viewports height and width), and vmax (maximum of viewports height and width).

867 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

19 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now