Solved

c3750 nat

Posted on 2008-10-06
14
897 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-05
Howdy,
  I currently have a cisco c3750 switch hooked up to a linksys router. What I'm wanting to do on the Cisco 3750 is to be able to nat. I want to have it so thatall  the linksys see's is 192.168.1.1 which i statically assigned to g1/0/1 which leads to the linksys router. Is this possible?

I enabled ip routing on the switch and turned g1/0/1 into a L3 port. But for some reason I cannot find the NAT command. Any Ideas?
0
Comment
Question by:Paktusjet
  • 8
  • 6
14 Comments
 
LVL 8

Expert Comment

by:sstone55423
ID: 22655919
0
 
LVL 8

Expert Comment

by:sstone55423
ID: 22655922
PAQ
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:Paktusjet
ID: 22655979
I'm currently in that same situation as the link you provided.

Switch#config t
Switch(config)#ip nat ?
% Unrecognized command
Switch(config)#int fa0/1
Switch(config-if)#ip nat ?
% Unrecognized command

so how would I get NAT enabled? Many accepted solutions in that link stated that NAT was not supported by 3750's. Is that true or false? If so I need a work around.
0
PRTG Network Monitor: Intuitive Network Monitoring

Network Monitoring is essential to ensure that computer systems and network devices are running. Use PRTG to monitor LANs, servers, websites, applications and devices, bandwidth, virtual environments, remote systems, IoT, and many more. PRTG is easy to set up & use.

 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:Paktusjet
ID: 22655988
I cannot configure the Linksys. What it has on it has to stay the same with no changes.
0
 
LVL 8

Accepted Solution

by:
sstone55423 earned 500 total points
ID: 22655998
http://www.tek-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=1159588&page=1
 
AND
http://www.netxg.net/newsxg/2007/cisco-catalyst-3750-series-switch-quick-look/ 
Q. Is NAT supported? A. No. There are no plans to support NAT.
 
Well, I was wondering about that.  Sorry to point you the wrong way.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:Paktusjet
ID: 22656028
well can there be a work around? Is there any way that I can mask these IP addresses? This Linksys router does not know about the other networks on my backside. I need some way to wrap the IP's on my backside inside of one usable IP address if I cannot NAT.
0
 
LVL 8

Expert Comment

by:sstone55423
ID: 22656121
Well, just throw a router in there for basic NAT.  A Linksys WRT54G is good, or something like that.  There are other models without wireless that are like $29 at Best Buy.  It will do basic one to many NAT, and solve all of your problems.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:Paktusjet
ID: 22656126
well we have limited resources. All I have to work with is that 3750 and a Linksys router.
0
 
LVL 8

Expert Comment

by:sstone55423
ID: 22656127
I know, with the other linksys, that it will look a bit odd...but You seem to have some reason you don;t want the other Linksys to do the NAT.  SO...
Internet-->OLD Linksys-->New Linksys -->CIsco 3750
Does that make sense?  Or can you set the first Linksys to do NAT (or is it out of your realm of control?)
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:Paktusjet
ID: 22656146
the main linksys is natting but heres how the setup kinda looks..

computer -----> 3750 -----> linksys -----------> modem
                                                    (NAT)

I have one class C given to me. which is 192.168.1.0. I'm running out of room on that C network. So I need to implement 2.0 and 3.0. My Linksys doesnt know about the 2.0 and 3.0 network which Is why I need it to mask them 2 networks. And yes there is a reason behind all of this, but it is fully supported :) I just can't change the linksys.
0
 
LVL 8

Expert Comment

by:sstone55423
ID: 22656197
Change the NAT'ing Linksys to NAT the 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0    That is, change to use a class B (/16) network instead of a Class C (/24).  Then you get lots more IP addresses, and can still route between them without changing anything on the PC's.
0
 
LVL 8

Expert Comment

by:sstone55423
ID: 22656201
Well, if you truely can't change the existing linksys.  Like I said, get another Linksys.  Make it's outside address 192.168.1.x and then set the inside addresses to 10.1.0.0/24 and you will have plenty of inside addreses.
0
 
LVL 8

Expert Comment

by:sstone55423
ID: 22656202
Whoops  10.0.0.0/8 ot 10.0.0.0/16  (not 24) or you will be no better off.  I better get some sleep.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Closing Comment

by:Paktusjet
ID: 31503686
I just wish there was another way :)
0

Featured Post

Active Directory Webinar

We all know we need to protect and secure our privileges, but where to start? Join Experts Exchange and ManageEngine on Tuesday, April 11, 2017 10:00 AM PDT to learn how to track and secure privileged users in Active Directory.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Data center, now-a-days, is referred as the home of all the advanced technologies. In-fact, most of the businesses are now establishing their entire organizational structure around the IT capabilities.
When it comes to security, there are always trade-offs between security and convenience/ease of administration. This article examines some of the main pros and cons of using key authentication vs password authentication for hosting an SFTP server.
Internet Business Fax to Email Made Easy - With  eFax Corporate (http://www.enterprise.efax.com), you'll receive a dedicated online fax number, which is used the same way as a typical analog fax number. You'll receive secure faxes in your email, f…
Here's a very brief overview of the methods PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg) offers for monitoring bandwidth, to help you decide which methods you´d like to investigate in more detail.  The methods are covered in more detail in o…

828 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question