Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of ARob720
ARob720

asked on

Exchange 2007 Transition (and offsite move)

I am building out a series of 64bit, 2003 R2 servers (AD, NAS, Exchange 2007, Web) with the intent of moving them offsite to rented rack space at Verizon's colo facility.  I already have a router, switch and separate domain in this location.  The idea is to gain continuity by moving our services and nationwide VPN termination offsite to a more secure, reliable power and AC environment.  The AD and NAS servers are already built and running on my local domain/subnet, but are not yet moved.  I am building these services in an IBM BladeCenter S.  The move will require IP changes and some routing configuration local and remote.

My question is, should I wait until after I have already moved AD, and VPN termination to the new facility, before I build the Exchange 2007 server?  Then build 2007 in the environment in which it is going to reside, IP, Subnet, etc.  Or can I build Exchange 2007 locally, Transition from 2003, move Mailboxes, and decommission Exchange 2003 then 'Forklift" the entire BladeCenter S. AD NAS, Exchange et al.

I do not have a test environment and with email being the company's life's blood, I only have one shot at this.

Thank you.
Avatar of Exchange_Geek
Exchange_Geek
Flag of India image

If there is a good connectivity between both sites - then i would prefer to install Active Directory Server (DC / GC) on remote site - let replication start.

Install Exchange 2007 on local site - move the mailboxes and public folders etc.

Fork Lift the server - work with the routing configuration once your server is placed on the new site.

Yes, you need to remember that you are working with live database - this means before you work with moving the boxes - for heaven sake please take Exchange backup - also the downtime is also involved in this case - but idea looks fool-proof provided your transportation is also fool-proof ;)
Avatar of ARob720
ARob720

ASKER

Speed - The colo is considered to be on the backbone of the Internet and I have multiple Ts coming into my HQ.  If data transfer is slow after the move then we will invest in a Point-to-Point T.

My plan is to move the 2003 AD to the colo and promote that to be the GC for the domain.  I will keep local ADs at few of my sites as well as one at our HQ.  I may use DFS for the data (NAS) depending on overall speed.

From your response are you recommending making my decision in this order:

 A) Build in Colo (As long as inter-site speed is good) - 1. Move AD to colo.  2. Build Exchange 07 in place, and move mailboxes in groups, gauging speed.  3. Decommission local Exchange 03.

B) Forklift (If speed is slow) - 1. Build locally at HQ with local Subnet/IP.  2. Move Mailboxes etc. to 07 server, 3. Forklift AD & Exchange together to colo 4. Change IPs, routing, MX, etc.

Typing it out I am leaning towards A as, in that scenario, I will always have Exchange 03 to go back to if something were to go wrong in the move.  I can build at the colo and move a few test mailboxes then do the rest in manageable groups.  I do regular full backups of my infostores.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Exchange_Geek
Exchange_Geek
Flag of India image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of ARob720

ASKER

Thank you.  The Exchange 07 server will reside in an IBM BladeCenter Chassis which also contains AD so with the current hardware I cannot test AD or routing without bringing Exchange along for the ride.  Although through your comments I have decided to get a second chassis for HQ (local LAN), therefore giving the capability to build and test locally, then move out to the data center with confidence.