• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 1854
  • Last Modified:

Should we buy gigabit switches over fast ethernet?

Hi Experts,
My company is moving to a new building and I'm looking at upgrading our switches at the same time.  Right now we have 2  48 port 3COM Superstack3 4500 10/100 switches connecting 25 pcs and 10 servers.
We will be increasing the number of pcs to 50-75 within the next year and our new building will have a new phone system with IP enabled phones.  For the phones we are going to buy a POE 10/100 switch, but for the rest of the network I'm looking for a recommendation on whether to upgrade to gigabit switches or not.
I'm looking at the Powerconnect 5448 here:  http://www.dell.com/content/products/category.aspx/data_center_gig?c=us&cs=04&l=en&s=bsd
The 10/100 switch is about half the price.
About half the servers and pcs have gigabit nics in them (we will probably upgrade the nics in the servers if we go with gigabit) and in the future all new pcs and servers I'm sure will have gig nics.
Should we see a noticable performance increase if we do upgrade to the gigabit switches?
Any other recommendations for the configuration or brand of switch?
The cabling run throughout the building is CAT5e.
  • 2
  • 2
3 Solutions
For the purpose of future expandability and performance I would definitely upgrade to gigabit switches. There are too many network variables to determine whether you will see a difference or not i.e. network traffic.

You should at least put a gigibit switch at the core of your network where the servers reside, and put 10/100 for the access portion of your network going to the workstation. Most 10/100 switches have gigabit uplinks that can run to your core gigabit switches.

jjones2002Author Commented:
Thanks for the post Soulja,

I just spoke with a Dell switch specialist about this as well, and i think i'm more confused now than before i spoke to him.
He recommended we go with the PowerConnect 6248 which has resilient stacking.  His reason for the recommendation was for scalability purposes.
What i'm confused about is do we really need the stacking option of the switches?
I understand its a faster connection that using one of the ports and just uplinking to the next switch, but do we really need it?
Is uplinking to the next switch not recommended in the networking world?
The way we would have it setup is 2 T1 lines coming into our Firewall and then the firewall connected to the switch with the servers, then the other switch uplinked to the servers' switch via an open ports on both switches.  If the company grows i would just add another switch and then uplink it to the next switch.
Is that a solid plan for this upgrade if i buy the gigabit switches?

  Your network design is very dependent on what you intend to do, and what your budget is.

  People have bragged to me that they've set up their home at GigE speeds.  That's usually two or three PC's, and a residential uplink (20Mb/s max).  If you can't possibly do over 20Mb/s, why do you think you need more than 20Mb/s (100Mb/s switch)?

  A similar conversation came up about what wireless networking to support.  This person had a 2Mb/s uplink.  They wanted to migrate all of their stuff up to 802.11g.  There's no harm in it, but it won't help their speed.

  MRTG is fairly simple to install and configure.  Use it to monitor your port speeds.  Most people want to upgrade when they reach 60% to 80% utilization.  

  One guy insisted that his server NEEDED GigE.  When I showed him his graphs he realized that he was content on 10/100.  His peak bandwidth was about 40Mb/s during file transfers, and his normal bandwidth was only about 2Mb/s.  Why waste a GigE port on something so low?  The limitation was his application, not the available bandwidth.

  I'm very fond of Cisco equipment.  I've had problems with the Dell switches in the past.  They simply aren't as fast nor reliable in high load environments.   If you're not in an extremely high load environment, then it's not as big of a concern.  I've known people with HP equipment in the past, who upgraded to Cisco when they could.  They're good, but if you're in a really high load environment, you'll want to upgrade to the best.

  You may wish to consider upgrading to something better than a standard 24/48 port switch.   A year or so ago, I upgraded my office from a collection of 24 port switches to a Catalyst 5500 13 slot chassis.  That's 2 supervisors (what runs it), and 11 slots for line cards.  It's populated with 6 24 port 10/100 line cards, and 2 48 port 10Mb/s cards.   In the last year, no one has really touched the switch.  I demonstrated the hot swap capability of the power supplies (shut one down, pulled it out, put it back in and powered it back up), and added the second supervisor.  It hasn't had a need to be shut down or power cycled since we brought it up.  I did add the redundant supervisor, but no restart is required.  We've added ports, and I've done some tracing of MAC addresses (who has this MAC?), but that's normal operation. :)

  Here's a picture, before we swapped the top line card for a supervisor.


  The 10 Mb/s ports had been intended to be VoIP, but later a vendor was selected and they provided 48 port 10/100+POE switches, and didn't want to run on our hardware.  They wanted to make the extra buck selling us switches.

  For the upgrade capability, you should consider a 6000/6500 chassis.   There's a whole variety of line cards available, and you can upgrade on the fly.  Simply put a better line card in a slot, move the connections to the new card, and you can pull the old card out to free up a slot.  

  You can get an used 6000/6500 chassis pretty cheap on eBay.  You can also get the line cards very cheap also.  You probably don't need the latest greatest and most feature filled cards, so people are selling their old cards cheap.   I don't have my spreadsheets with me, but if my memory serves me correctly, I estimated at median eBay prices that I could build a nicely populated 6500 chassis out for about $2000.   That was to meet our needs.  Yours will likely be a lot cheaper.

  All in all, this would give you a huge port density so you won't have to manage multiple switches, a brand that's extremely reliable (there's a reason virtually every provider uses them), and the flexibility to upgrade as your business requires, without replacing entire switches.   It's always cool to show customers the enterprise switch that you run in your wiring closet too. :)   It looks a lot better than someone seeing a bunch of small switches with crossovers stacked on top of each other.

  If you find there is a requirement for one or some users to be on GigE, put them on the GigE card.  You'll always find a few "power" users who scream that they MUST have GigE.  Put them on the GigE card, and let them go.   They'll be satisfied.

  It'll be a few days before I'm back to my office.  If you're interested, I can post some of the part numbers and median prices, so you can estimate your needs.  

  I'm a big fan of buying from eBay.   I've configured several chassis switches like this from parts acquired there.  I have a few 5000 cards at my house still from customers who wanted changes before I installed the chassis, or from upgrades.  I had less than a 10% failure rate in buying from eBay.  Where the parts are so cheap compared to new, it doesn't hurt.   Be careful who you buy from.  Check the descriptions carefully, and carefully track who you got which parts from.  I messed that up when I received about 20 of those 24 port line cards from about 15 different suppliers.  I unboxed them all and then began testing.  2 were bad, and I have no clue where they came from.  I lost about $60 in defective parts that I couldn't return, but made over $1000 selling the complete switches.

  Oh, and to clarify, I'm not offering to build it or consult for you.  I'm busy right now, with barely enough time to hop in here and post.  I'm more than happy to guide you in the right direction so you can do it yourself.  :)

  If you really want standalone switches, you should look at the Cisco Catalyst WS-C2960G-48TC-L .  I have a different spreadsheet back at the office that has the comparison of Cisco gear for PPS and backplane fiber throughput.  The 2960's are pretty good switches.  I know of one place that has a dozen or so deployed with absolutely no problems.  They're afraid of going to a big chassis, so they continue with the collection of standalone switches.

  Switching to Cisco, you may see a performance increase over other switches.  It'll really depend on your load.  I went from a hub to a WS-C2980G-A (80 port 10/100 with GBIC uplinks).  I do have a 20Mb/s uplink, but I see absolutely no difference, because the most I'll ever do is 20Mb/s.   I only really needed about 5 ports, but I bought a lot of them and haven't sold all of them yet. :)

No you do not need stacking at all. You benefit from it if you want to make the two switches act as one for simplified management. No network traffic crosses the stack cables. You can simply uplink your switches.
jjones2002Author Commented:
Soulja, thanks for the advice - i really felt like the Dell guy was trying to push something on us we didn't need.  For expandability I'll recommend we upgrade to Gigabit switches but i don't think i'll push too hard for it, since I'm not sure whether we would see much immediate benefit and since upgrading seems fairly painless.

JWSmythe - thanks for the notes as well - not sure if we're ready for such an endeavor as building our own chassis
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Free Tool: ZipGrep

ZipGrep is a utility that can list and search zip (.war, .ear, .jar, etc) archives for text patterns, without the need to extract the archive's contents.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way to say thank you for being a part of the community.

  • 2
  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now