Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
?
Solved

What is the minimum SQL security needed for a MS SQL 2005 database?

Posted on 2008-10-10
4
Medium Priority
?
237 Views
Last Modified: 2010-08-05
What is the minimum SQL security needed for a MS SQL 2005 database?

I've setup a database instance and have added a database.  The software that I wrote interfaces the database and adds/updates/removes table data but does not change the database structure.  My concern is that I want to make sure that I'm not giving the user too much access in case they connect with a SQL database manager/etc.

In server roles I've assigned "public" to the user and
In User Mapping I've assigned "db_owner" and "public"

Also, something to consider is that I'm going to have a lot of users being added/removed, so if there's a better way to manage this process please let me know.

Thank you!
0
Comment
Question by:jdraggi
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 143

Expert Comment

by:Guy Hengel [angelIII / a3]
ID: 22690672
db_owner means: full access (including drop table !!!!)
so, remove that ASAP, and instead you might want to specify db_datareader and db_datawriter roles.

side note: lock down sql server 2005 article:
http://duartes.org/gustavo/articles/Lock-Down-SQL-Server-2005.aspx
0
 
LVL 60

Expert Comment

by:chapmandew
ID: 22690685
>>In User Mapping I've assigned "db_owner" and "public"
Not a good practice...the db_owner part.  The idea is to write procs and assign the user permission to run them.  

Are you using SQL Auth?  If so, then the user doesn't really even need to know the userid and pwd. They just connect to the app, and go about their business.  They shoudln't really need to access the db directly.
0
 
LVL 3

Author Comment

by:jdraggi
ID: 22690762
angelIII, We're still in testing at this point so this is very good information.  So, db_datareader and db_datawriter roles just let them update/add/remove table data, nothing else?

chapmandew, Yes, we are using SQL Auth however we also have to support trusted connections as well.  I see your point about not allowing them to even know the username/password however that won't fly with this project.  They also want the ability to create their own reports/etc so the database has to be open but protected at the same time.
0
 
LVL 143

Accepted Solution

by:
Guy Hengel [angelIII / a3] earned 2000 total points
ID: 22693124
> So, db_datareader and db_datawriter roles just let them update/add/remove table data, nothing else?
yes, exactly. on all existing and future tables.

0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Site Down Detector

Helpful to verify reports of your own downtime, or to double check a downed website you are trying to access.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

An alternative to the "For XML" way of pivoting and concatenating result sets into strings, and an easy introduction to "common table expressions" (CTEs). Being someone who is always looking for alternatives to "work your data", I came across this …
Microsoft Access has a limit of 255 columns in a single table; SQL Server allows tables with over 255 columns, but reading that data is not necessarily simple.  The final solution for this task involved creating a custom text parser and then reading…
Via a live example, show how to extract insert data into a SQL Server database table using the Import/Export option and Bulk Insert.
This videos aims to give the viewer a basic demonstration of how a user can query current session information by using the SYS_CONTEXT function
Suggested Courses

572 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question