Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of brothertu
brothertuFlag for Australia

asked on

Site to site VPN problem between Netgear FVG318 and Sonicwall TZ170

Hi, I am having problem to setup site to site VPN between a Netgear FVG318 box and Sonicwall TZ170.
I have followed the manuals of both appliances but failed all the time. I have also searched out a KB article of Sonicwall talking about the trick to setup VPN between Netgear FVS318 and Sonicwall box but that didnt fix my problem.

Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Please find following the details of my configuration and the error logs on both routers as well.
Please feel free to let me know if you need more information.

1. Settings on Sonicwall TZ170
Model: TZ 170 enhanced
Firmware version: SonicOS enhanced 3.1.0.11-30e
Basic network setting:
  WAN IP: 60.x.x.147
  LAN IP: 192.168.0.1/255.255.255.0
General VPN setting:
  "NAT Traversal"  disabled.
  "IKE Dead Peer Detection"  disabled.
  "Enable Fragmented Packet Handling"  enabled
Security Policy:
  IPSec keying mode: IKE using preshared secret
  Name: VPN-sonic
  Ipsec Primary gateway name or address: 201.x.x.26
  Ipsec Secondary gateway name or address: 0.0.0.0
  Shared secret: 0123456789
  Local IKE ID (optional):(I left it blank)
  Peer IKE ID (optional): ( I left it blank)
Local network: 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0
Remote network: 192.168.200.0/255.255.255.0
IKE (Phase 1) Proposal:
  Exchange: main mode
  DH Group: group 2
  Encryption: 3DES
  Authentication: SHA1
  Life time(seconds): 28800
Ipsec (phase 2) proposal
  Protocol: ESP
  Encryption: 3DES
  Authentication: SHA1
  DH group: group 2
  Life time (seconds): 28800
  Perfect Forward Secrecy: Enabled
Advanced settings:
  Enable keep alive: enabled

2. Settings on Netgear FVG318 :
Model: I reckon this is a FVG318 V2 from the version of firmware
Firmware version: v2.1.2-67R
Basic network setting:
  WAN IP: 201.x.x.26
  LAN IP: 192.168.200.1

IKE Policy settings:
  Direction type: both
  Exchange mode: main
  Local identifier type: local WAN IP
  Local identifier: 201.x.x.26
  Remote identifier type: remote WAN IP
  Remote identifier: 60.x.x.147
IKE SA Parameters:
  Encryption Algorithm: 3DES
  Authentication Algorithm: SHA-1
  Authentication method: Pre-shared key
  Pre-shared Key: 0123456789
  DH group: group 2
  SA-lifetime (sec): 28800
VPN Policy:
  Policy type: Auto policy
  Remote endpoint: (IP address) 60.x.x.26
  Local IP type: subnet
  Local network: 192.168.200.0/255.255.255.0
  Remote IP type: subnet
  Remote network: 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0
Auto Policy Parameters:
  SA lifetime 28800 seconds
  Encryption Algorithm: 3DES
  Intergirty Algorithm: SHA-1
  PFS key group: DH group 2, enabled

3. VPN log on FVG318:
2008-10-13 : INFO:  accept a request to establish IKE-SA: 60.x.x.26
2008-10-13 : INFO:  Configuration found for 60.x.x.26.
2008-10-13 : INFO:  Initiating new phase 1 negotiation: 201.x.x.147[500]<=>60.x.x.26[500]
2008-10-13 : INFO:  Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2008-10-13 : ERROR:  Invalid SA protocol type: 0
2008-10-13 : ERROR:  Phase 2 negotiation failed due to time up waiting for phase1.
2008-10-13 : ERROR:  Phase 1 negotiation failed due to time up for 60.x.x.26[500].

4.VPN log on TZ170
VPN IKE      IKE Initiator: No response - remote party timeout      
VPN IKE      IKE Initiator: No response - remote party timeout      
VPN IKE      IKE Initiator: Start Main Mode negotiation (Phase 1)      
VPN IKE      IKE negotiation aborted due to timeout      

SOLUTION
Avatar of SysExpert
SysExpert
Flag of Israel image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of brothertu

ASKER

Thanks lot for your reply.
Some more background:
The head office is using a static WAN IP which is 60.x.x.147. A ADSL modem is in front of the Sonicwall and it was configured as bridge mode.
 The branch B is getting IP dynamicaly via PPPOE on the Netgear router, which is '201.x.x.26" at the moment. A cable modem is in front of the Netgear box. I am not able to access that modem but I think it was also configured as bridge mode because the Netgear is getting WAN IP via PPPOE directly.

To answer your questions:
Sysexpert:
The Sonicwall is pingable but not the Netgear one. I can remotely access Netgear box though.

Dpk wal:
I have done that before I posted the question but it didn't make any difference. So I just left it blank because they are "optional".
What warried me much is the error log on Netgear side: "ERROR:  Invalid SA protocol type: 0" which indicates the mismatch of those things you mentioned. I have checked on both sites but could find any mismatch.

I am wondering if it's the dynamic IP problem on the Netgear side even though the IP address on Netgear has not been changed.
A question in my mind is: would it be possible that the VPN can detect  the Netgear's IP type is dynamic?

ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
As the IP address was dynamic; there is a possibility that the IP address changed between the time you configured the router and when the VPN tunnel was negotiated; as you have ddns this would mean that whatever the IP address it would always be reachable through the name.
Normally when you configure VPN with dynamic IP; the VPN would come up but would go down when the IP address changes,

Other than this I cannot think of any other reason.

Thank you.
Hi Dpk wal,
The IP address hasn't been changed on the Netgear box since after the configuration done as the modem has been running with no reboot since then.
I have no logical explanation to offer for this behavior.
Hi Moderator,
Sorry, I didn't mean to choose their posts as solutions though I'd like to assign points to them.
The comment I posted at 14th of October shoud be the right solution for my case.
I wonder if you could help me out with this.
Many thanks.