<div>
it would cause issues where the end clients would not be able to access the virtual server using the DNS name as it may be incorrect.<br />
<br />
but as it would be a static IP address the record in DNS would be the same any way even if it dont update it.
</div>


it would cause issues where the end clients would not be able to access the virtual server using the DNS name as it may be incorrect.

but as it would be a static IP address the record in DNS would be the same any way even if it dont update it.

<div>
<div class="content wysiwyg-content">
We have a 2 node Active / Passive cluster. &nbsp;The cluster appears to work fine. &nbsp;The cluster name &quot;VIRTUALSQL&quot; has an A record in DNS which we can ping and resolve with a nslookup.<br />
<br />
The cluster logs are reporting the following error :<br />
<br />
00000c14.00000f40::2008/10<wbr />/14-15:13:<wbr />23.637 ERR &nbsp;Network Name &lt;SQL Network Name(VIRTUALSQL)&gt;: Failed to register DNS A records for owner VIRTUALSQL.abc.com over adapter 'ABCDSQ1_TEAM(1)', status 9017<br />
<br />
Could this error cause the SQL Cluster to fail.<br />
<br />
Our DNS Servers are Active Directory Integrated and set for Dynamic Updates : Secure Only.<br />
<br />
Would this error cause the SQL cluster to fail over ? or cause cluster issues.<br />
<br />

</div>
</div>


We have a 2 node Active / Passive cluster.  The cluster appears to work fine.  The cluster name "VIRTUALSQL" has an A record in DNS which we can ping and resolve with a nslookup.

The cluster logs are reporting the following error :

00000c14.00000f40::2008/10/14-15:13:23.637 ERR  Network Name <SQL Network Name(VIRTUALSQL)>: Failed to register DNS A records for owner VIRTUALSQL.abc.com over adapter 'ABCDSQ1_TEAM(1)', status 9017

Could this error cause the SQL Cluster to fail.

Our DNS Servers are Active Directory Integrated and set for Dynamic Updates : Secure Only.

Would this error cause the SQL cluster to fail over ? or cause cluster issues.



Microsoft, Windows, 2003 Server, Cluster DNS Issue

Windows Server 2003 was based on Windows XP and was released in four editions: Web, Standard, Enterprise and Datacenter. It also had derivative versions for clusters, storage and Microsoft’s Small Business Server. Important upgrades included integrating Internet Information Services (IIS), improvements to Active Directory (AD) and Group Policy (GP), and the migration to Automated System Recovery (ASR).