paulo999
asked on
SQL and Exchange DBs and Logs on SAN
Hello, I've got a question re. disk performance for SQL and Exchange running on a SAN.
With a SAN with a fair amount (16GB) of cache, and using 4Gb Fibre links, is it still necessary to split the Logs files and Databases over different arrays like it used to be with local storage?
I realise its probably down to the amount of traffic the servers are processing, but I was just wondering from a 'rule of thumb' point of view.
Many thanks.
With a SAN with a fair amount (16GB) of cache, and using 4Gb Fibre links, is it still necessary to split the Logs files and Databases over different arrays like it used to be with local storage?
I realise its probably down to the amount of traffic the servers are processing, but I was just wondering from a 'rule of thumb' point of view.
Many thanks.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.