Recovery delete spool files

A user delete all the qjoblog and we need to recover them - any ides?
No they were not backed up
dllssnAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
MurpheyConnect With a Mentor Application ConsultantCommented:
Hi Dllssn,

No sorry.... you can't rollback the delete on an AS/400, it's not a windows machine with a recycle-bin :)
the only thing you can do is using the DSPLOG command to see what is still available, but that is probably just a couple of day's maximum.
And..... protect the qjoblog output from deletion by exclude user access on that level.

Regards,
Murphe
0
 
tliottaCommented:
dllssn:

If there was no procedure in place to capture spooled joblogs, then there is no procedure available to recover them.

Generally, spooled joblogs wouldn't even be created unless an error condition needed to be investigated; but it sounds like your site uses them for some other purpose. A spooled joblog isn't a particularly good place to store "information" for later analysis.

As with Windows, once spooled output is destroyed, there's nothing left to recover -- spooled output in Windows doesn't go to the Recycle Bin when deleted either; nor does a Recycle Bin work very well when deleting stuff from a Windows server when connected from a client.

Servers need to automate backup/recovery of anything that must be recoverable. If such procedures aren't implemented or are inactive, then there's not much that can be done.

For spooled files on an AS/400, spooled files that must be saved should be replicated to a secured output queue as soon as the file is closed. That might be done through associating a data queue with the main output queue and monitoring the data queue for notification that a spooled file is ready. At that point, a replication can be done.

Also, if a user shouldn't be deleting spooled files from a given output queue, then there shouldn't be any authority granted that allows deletions. If authority is granted, it's hard to complain when the authority is used.

Tom
0
 
MurpheyApplication ConsultantCommented:
Thanks Tom,

for reexplaining my answer :s
0
 
tliottaCommented:
Murph's right. The question was asked, and it was correctly answered by murphey2. My comments are intended purely for subject matter fullness to add (possible) value for later EE visitors to this thread. (Maybe I need a standard disclaimer... hmmm...)

Tom
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.