Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 1117
  • Last Modified:

Cisco ASA or WatchGuard x750e

Which is better?  Cisco ASA or WatchGuard x750e?  I have an x750e but am approaching my annual maintenance renewal and want to know if I should keep it or change to a Cisco.  What do you think?
0
tf9069
Asked:
tf9069
  • 2
1 Solution
 
cv790529Commented:
Depends on if you like the security services in the Watchguard or not really.  I know the Cisco ASA also has it's own security services and I have no experience with them, but I do with Watchguard.  GAV/IPS, SpamScreen, and IPS are really where most firewalls shine or fail these days.  From my Watchguard experience I find these services to be very flexible, effective, and cost efficient for all my customers networks.  Cisco's are probably very similar.  The one problem I would have of moving to a Cisco ASA is the relearning of how to properly setup, troubleshoot, and maintain the new Cisco devices.  I'm not sure what the price ranges are for a Cisco ASA or if they are even comparable to the x750e.  Both devices are solid and can offer high flexiblity.  So it really boils down to 1 thing.  Are you happy with your watchguard?  If not, go Cisco.   If you are happy with the Watchguard, I would stay due to the pain of moving to a Cisco ASA.

I hope that helps.
0
 
tf9069Author Commented:
Thanks for the comments.  I am happy with the WG for the most part.  What I am having trouble with is... when something is bogging it down, I don't know where to go and look for the cause.  For example, today the performance just went to crap and I couldn't find anything out of the ordinary with the bandwidth meter or service watch.  So I just turned it off and back on.  It worked great again for about 3 hours then it happened again.  I just don't know how to troubleshoot it well and the WG support doesn't really help much.
0
 
cv790529Commented:
Okay, that makes sense, WG definitely does lack on monitoring.   I find the bandwidth monitoring to be very arcaic at best.  Performance on a watchguard can really be seen (if it is a hardware problem) in the Status Tab on Firebox System Manager.  A lot of times, a watchguard can be hit so hard that it utilizes too much of the RAM.  If the RAM is using over half, you will see a performance decline on the throughput.  Also, you can look at connection limits.  You may want to ask Watchguard support about both of these.

I'm not sure if a Cisco ASA can give you much better monitoring support.  That is something should be researched before diving in.
0

Featured Post

Who's Defending Your Organization from Threats?

Protecting against advanced threats requires an IT dream team – a well-oiled machine of people and solutions working together to defend your organization. Download our resource kit today to learn more about the tools you need to build you IT Dream Team!

  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now