Cisco ASA or WatchGuard x750e

Which is better?  Cisco ASA or WatchGuard x750e?  I have an x750e but am approaching my annual maintenance renewal and want to know if I should keep it or change to a Cisco.  What do you think?
tf9069Asked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

cv790529Commented:
Depends on if you like the security services in the Watchguard or not really.  I know the Cisco ASA also has it's own security services and I have no experience with them, but I do with Watchguard.  GAV/IPS, SpamScreen, and IPS are really where most firewalls shine or fail these days.  From my Watchguard experience I find these services to be very flexible, effective, and cost efficient for all my customers networks.  Cisco's are probably very similar.  The one problem I would have of moving to a Cisco ASA is the relearning of how to properly setup, troubleshoot, and maintain the new Cisco devices.  I'm not sure what the price ranges are for a Cisco ASA or if they are even comparable to the x750e.  Both devices are solid and can offer high flexiblity.  So it really boils down to 1 thing.  Are you happy with your watchguard?  If not, go Cisco.   If you are happy with the Watchguard, I would stay due to the pain of moving to a Cisco ASA.

I hope that helps.
0
tf9069Author Commented:
Thanks for the comments.  I am happy with the WG for the most part.  What I am having trouble with is... when something is bogging it down, I don't know where to go and look for the cause.  For example, today the performance just went to crap and I couldn't find anything out of the ordinary with the bandwidth meter or service watch.  So I just turned it off and back on.  It worked great again for about 3 hours then it happened again.  I just don't know how to troubleshoot it well and the WG support doesn't really help much.
0
cv790529Commented:
Okay, that makes sense, WG definitely does lack on monitoring.   I find the bandwidth monitoring to be very arcaic at best.  Performance on a watchguard can really be seen (if it is a hardware problem) in the Status Tab on Firebox System Manager.  A lot of times, a watchguard can be hit so hard that it utilizes too much of the RAM.  If the RAM is using over half, you will see a performance decline on the throughput.  Also, you can look at connection limits.  You may want to ask Watchguard support about both of these.

I'm not sure if a Cisco ASA can give you much better monitoring support.  That is something should be researched before diving in.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Software Firewalls

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.