Sorting array of coordinates

Hi, I have a collection of coordinates x, y (doubles) i.e. (3.4, 5.3), (3.0, 5.5), and so on...

I put them into an array and I need to sort them based on either coordinate. I need to use the sort method from the java.util.Arrays class.

I imported the class, created an array in which I put all my coordinate objects. I'm not sure how the Arrays.sort() method works. How do I go about sorting the array based on either coordinate (x or y).

Let's say that I have :

Coordinate [] myArray = {c1, c2, c3, c4, ...cn} where each c is a coordinate i.e c1 = (3.4, 5.5)

Once again I need to use the built in method in the Arrays class.

Would I have to do something like,
Arrays.sort(myArray.getX()) getX() gets the x cordinate
in order to sort all the coordinates in increasing order of the X coordinate?

Sorry if this seems a trivial question, but even when I create an array on int's (int [] myArray), and I do Arrays.sort(myArray), the code doesn't compile.

p.s. I need to use the Arrays.sort() method, no need to create my own implementation.
LVL 1
ubuntuguyAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

petr_hlucinCommented:
What you should do is use the following version of Sort:
static void sort(Object[] a, Comparator c);

The Comparator and Coordinate would be the following in your case.
class CoordinageComparator implements Comparator{
 
  public int compare(Coordinate coordinate1, Coordinate coordinate2) {
    return coordinate1.compareTo(cordinate2);
  }
}
 
class Coordinate {
  public double X;
  public double Y;
 
  public CompareTo(Coordinate c) {
    if (c.X < this.X)
      return -1;
    else if (c.X > this.X)
      return 1;
    else 
      return 0;
  }
}

Open in new window

0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
ubuntuguyAuthor Commented:
Hmmm, I thought about doing it this way, but my method must run in O(nlogn) and this would run in O(n^2).  I know the Arrays.sort() runs in O(nlogn), but I'm unsure on how to implement it.
0
petr_hlucinCommented:
IMHO this would run in O(n*log(n)) - CompareTo() runs in O(1) and Sort by itself runs in O(n*log(n)). If you think that sort with Comparator runs in O(n^2) you may write your own sort :-). No, seriously I'm almost sure that Sort with Comparator runs in O(n*log(n)) and therefore the following code together with the one posted with my previous post should solve your problem in O(n*log(n)).
Coordinate[] c = new Coordinate[50];
 
Arrays.Sort(c, new CoordinateComparator());

Open in new window

0
ubuntuguyAuthor Commented:
thanks, you were right.  
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Algorithms

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.