Solved

Posted on 2008-10-22
Medium Priority
559 Views
Suppose that instead of using 16 bits for the network part of a class B address originally, 20 bits had been used.  How many class B networks would there have been?
0
Question by:ashp87
• 5
• 3

LVL 3

Expert Comment

ID: 22778024
your subnetting down, to increase the number of total networks, while decreasing the total number of hosts you can support. If you orignally had a /16 bit mask then you'd have a total of 65536 networks, if you take host bits (which is what you're doing when you subnet down) away and give them to the network you'd have 2^20 which would give you over a million networks (1048576), and you'd be able to support 4094 hosts on each network.
0

LVL 4

Expert Comment

ID: 22779719
The historical "class B" address range was 128.0.0.0 to 191.255.255.255.

That is, all addresses in the range:
01000000.00000000.00000000.00000000
01011111.11111111.11111111.11111111

This was historically spilt so that the 16 first bits were used for network address, and the remaining 16 bits were used for host addresses.

11111111.11111111.00000000.00000000

This resulted in:
00011111.11111111  = 2^14 = 16384 subnets

11111111.11111111.11110000.00000000

Which would have given:
00011111.11111111.1111 = 2^18 = 262144 subnets.

0

LVL 3

Expert Comment

ID: 22779849
i don't understand how you've reached this conclusion???

"This resulted in:
00011111.11111111  = 2^14 = 16384 subnets"

why do you have the first three bits off?

J
0

LVL 4

Expert Comment

ID: 22779896
The range for Class B was 128.0.0.0-191.255.255.255. The three first bits do not change.
0

LVL 4

Accepted Solution

larsga earned 1500 total points
ID: 22780095
Oops. Sorry. Managed to get that wrong.

The address range of class B was:
10000000.00000000.00000000.00000000
10111111.11111111.11111111.11111111

With 16-bit netmask, that gives (n for network bits, H for host bits):
10nnnnnn.nnnnnnnn.HHHHHHHH.HHHHHHHH
Giving 14 bits for network (2^14 = 16.384) and 16 bits for host (2^16 = 65.536).

10nnnnnn.nnnnnnnn.nnnnHHHH.HHHHHHHH
Giving 18 bits for network (2^18= 262.144) and 12 bits for host (2^12 = 4.096)
0

LVL 3

Expert Comment

ID: 22780212
yea, i keep wanna to think everything is classless. but i guess in the "real world" your class B address ranges actaully mean somthing.
thanx, for clearing that up.

J
0

LVL 4

Expert Comment

ID: 22780795
Note that I said "was" above. The traditional "classful" A/B/C/D/E were introduced in 1981. Routers were very short on CPU and RAM in those days, and one useful feature of "classful" was that the router only had to look at the first 3 bits of the address to determine the netmask.

It did have some serious problems, though. It was very inflexible, and the "C class" was very inefficient. Classful was abandoned around 1993, and was replaced by netmasks/prefixes (cidr). So what "class" an address is in has absolutely no practical meaning today in terms of inter-/intra-network routing - we use explicit netmasks instead.

The question was very explicit in what it asked for (I suppose he is cramming for something like CCDA/CCNA, the question is designed to show if you have an understanding of how the historical "classfull" division of the 32bit IP address space was done).

ashp87, the following should be useful reading for you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classful_network
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIDR
0

LVL 1

Author Closing Comment

ID: 31508795
The answer was actually 4094 i believe.
0

LVL 4

Expert Comment

ID: 22818073
Yes, you have to subtract 2 for the number of usable host addresses. The top and bottom host address have special meaning (broadcast and network respectively), so those two can't be used for actual hosts.

So the number of usable host addresses in a subnet is 2^n -2 (n being the number of bits used for the host part of the address).

0

Featured Post

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This month, Experts Exchange’s free Course of the Month is focused on CompTIA IT Fundamentals.
In this article I will be showing you how to subnet the easiest way possible for IPv4 (Internet Protocol version 4). This article does not cover IPv6. Keep in mind that subnetting requires lots of practice and time.
Michael from AdRem Software explains how to view the most utilized and worst performing nodes in your network, by accessing the Top Charts view in NetCrunch network monitor (https://www.adremsoft.com/). Top Charts is a view in which you can set seve…
Monitoring a network: why having a policy is the best policy? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the enormous benefits of having a policy-based approach when monitoring medium and large networks. Software utilized in this v…
Suggested Courses
Course of the Month9 days, 11 hours left to enroll