?
Solved

Switch choice

Posted on 2008-10-22
5
Medium Priority
?
223 Views
Last Modified: 2012-08-14
I'm considering switching from the Catalyst 6500 switches we use on our campus network to Catalyst 3750-E switches.  But, I'm not sure if its a good move.  The 3750 switches appear to be able to handle our traffic levels.  We use them at the access layer of our network.  The way we use the 6500's has changed.  Our bandwidth requirements between devices directly connected to the 6500's has reduced.  So the high backplane bandwidth of the 6500 seems no longer needed.  We basically use them now to aggregate the access layer connections (SX and LH/LX connections) and provide 10Gigabit links between sections of the campus.  Both of which we could do on the 3750's now.  We don't really use the blade feature of the 6500's either.  We do plan to use virtualization in our network.  But the 3750's appear to hande that as well.  I could go to the Catalyst 4500's but again, the blade feature really doesn't benefit us.  Opinions welcome.
0
Comment
Question by:peacefulwarfare
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:willbaclimon
ID: 22779117
If you already own the cat 6500's I wouldn't switch.

 Is it the cost of running (support/electricity) higher? Are there any advantages to going with the 3750-E that you wouldn't get from the 6500's? Would you cycle the 6500's to another location that would proof more useful?

Sounds like a downgrade to me.
0
 

Author Comment

by:peacefulwarfare
ID: 22779286
The switches are on a lease that is ending soon.  We have a choice of buying them at FMV or replacing them.  If we replace them in a new lease, it would be cheaper to go with 3750's.  The 3750-E's can take different modules so we could move between different fiber connections if necessary.
0
 
LVL 7

Accepted Solution

by:
willbaclimon earned 300 total points
ID: 22786836
If the 3750's are on the access layer like you stated, I wouldn't hesitate to go with the 3750's then.
0
 

Author Comment

by:peacefulwarfare
ID: 22795665
Thanks Will!
0
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:willbaclimon
ID: 22823991
anytime
0

Featured Post

What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Introduction This article explores the design of a cache system that can improve the performance of a web site or web application.  The assumption is that the web site has many more “read” operations than “write” operations (this is commonly the ca…
If you are thinking of adopting cloud services, or just curious as to what ‘the cloud’ can offer then the leader according to Gartner for Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) is Amazon Web Services (AWS).  When I started using AWS I was completely new…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
In this video we outline the Physical Segments view of NetCrunch network monitor. By following this brief how-to video, you will be able to learn how NetCrunch visualizes your network, how granular is the information collected, as well as where to f…
Suggested Courses

741 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question