Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
?
Solved

Two BladeCenter S Chasis in a Geographically Dispersed Cluster

Posted on 2008-10-23
2
Medium Priority
?
549 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-14
The decision has been made to use the IBM BladeCenter S for running and storing our file based applications, with a fully redundant BladeCenter S chassis running in an alternate location on site.  Our current setup uses a similar two location BladeCenter + Storage Appliance configuration but the primary location currently stores all of the live data, quorum info, etc for our File Server Cluster.  The backup location's storage appliance is updated using asynchronous mirroring so the appliance is simply being used for backup and not a live failover solution.

While the BladeCenter S is still not the ideal solution for our needs, the decision has been made.  I'm looking for the best possible solution for "clustering" volumes in order to utilize synchronous replication between chassis.  In other words, we would like to combine a volume from each BladeCenter into a single logical device so that it would appear to be a single volume.  

Can synchronous replication be accomplished by the storage controllers in the BladeCenter S or will our solution need to be software level mirroring?  

While our data storage needs are small, it is absolutely necessary that we have zero down time.  That is why we are going to such great lengths to make every piece of hardware and software fully redundant.  Your help is very appreciated.

0
Comment
Question by:TheWrongWay
2 Comments
 
LVL 63

Accepted Solution

by:
SysExpert earned 750 total points
ID: 22789031
You really need to talk to IBM.

A good software solution that we use in a similar situation is Double-take.


I hope this helps !
0
 

Author Comment

by:TheWrongWay
ID: 22789404
IBM in the past has been very cryptic in their responses.  With our current appliances we were told by IBM that it would be possible.  After testing, reading Redbooks and asking the same question over and over we were finally told the solution is not available and abandoned by IBM even before we purchased the appliances.  I was hoping to hear from someone that might actually have a solution in place.

As for Double-Take... great company, great software.  I imagine it will be on the top of our list for solutions.  My previous tests with Double-Take revealed a much longer failover time than simply using Microsoft Clustering but it's replication functionality makes it extremely appealing.

Thank you for your help.  :)
0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article aims to explain the working of CircularLogArchiver. This tool was designed to solve the buildup of log file in cases where systems do not support circular logging or where circular logging is not enabled
In the below post we have mentioned the best hosting type for startups. Also, check out some of the superlative web hosting companies that are proposing affordable web hosting solutions to host your startup website.
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of installing the necessary services and then configuring a Windows Server 2012 system as an iSCSI target. To install the necessary roles, go to Server Manager, and select Add Roles and Featu…
In this video, Percona Solutions Engineer Barrett Chambers discusses some of the basic syntax differences between MySQL and MongoDB. To learn more check out our webinar on MongoDB administration for MySQL DBA: https://www.percona.com/resources/we…

572 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question