Solved

Can SBS 2003 be used as a disaster recovery server for a small Windows domain?

Posted on 2008-10-23
3
186 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-18
I work in a Windows domain environment.  We currently have the following servers:
SQL 2005
Exchange 2003
Data/DC
IIS/Coldusion

I am curious if Small Business Server 2003 could handle these task for a limited number of users in a disaster recovery scenario.

Our SQL database is mission critical, but it is not a large nor complex database.

Anyways, just researching ideas and looking for suggestions.

Thanks!
0
Comment
Question by:thirdlifes
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
3 Comments
 
LVL 24

Expert Comment

by:ryansoto
ID: 22789064
It could but it would be easier IMO if it were a straight win2k3 machine
0
 
LVL 96

Accepted Solution

by:
Lee W, MVP earned 250 total points
ID: 22790725
Small Business Server (SBS) is designed to be THE FSMO master DC in any network it runs in.  If you were to try to run it, you would be well advised to rearchitect your entire network (assuming you have less than 75 users) to run off the SBS server.  Otherwise, I would consider this a BAD IDEA.  

If you need SERIOUS DR ideas, I can offer two off the top of my head -

If the data needs to be constantly up-to-date, then consider a product like Neverfail or DoubleTake.  They aren't especially inexpensive, but they will be cheaper than MOST other solutions for providing REAL-TIME redundancy for your network.

If you don't need REAL-TIME up-to-date data, then you can consider migrating critical services to Virtual machines which you can then backup on a regular basis and should the server they run on fail, you can restore your entire network to a new physical box.  There is significant Virtualization technology available for you to look into.  For example, VMWare server, VMWare ESXi, Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 R2, Microsoft Hyper-V - all these products are free (but with little or manufacturer support - that's a paid option.

If money is not a serious concern, you can look at clustering - either the applications themselves (SQL, IIS) - or using Virtual Machines running off a SAN.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:thirdlifes
ID: 22790786
Thanks for the reply Leew.

I currently use Microsoft Virtual Server for a few non-critical servers, and it does work.

I have not looked into the replication software you mentioned, but will do so.
I will post back after I looked at your recommendations.

Thanks!
0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Finally comes the third version of VMware Virtual SAN, whose name is 6.1, and comes loaded with new features many of which really are excellent and even surprising.
You may have discovered the 'Compatibility View Settings' workaround for making your SBS 2008 Remote Web Workplace 'connect to a computer' section stops 'working around' after a Windows 10 client upgrade.  That can be fixed so it 'works around' agai…
This tutorial will show how to configure a single USB drive with a separate folder for each day of the week. This will allow each of the backups to be kept separate preventing the previous day’s backup from being overwritten. The USB drive must be s…
This tutorial will walk an individual through setting the global and backup job media overwrite and protection periods in Backup Exec 2012. Log onto the Backup Exec Central Administration Server. Examine the services. If all or most of them are stop…

635 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question