no fair-queue on multilink members

On a multilink configuration with 2 or more member links, using priority queuing (CBWFQ) for voip, should the serial members have no fair-queue configured?  what is the implication of no doing this?

interface Multilink1
 description => MPLS VPN
 ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x
 load-interval 30
 no cdp enable
 ppp multilink
 ppp multilink fragment delay 10
 ppp multilink group 1
 max-reserved-bandwidth 100
 service-policy output llq-policy
!
interface Serial0/0/0
 no ip address
 encapsulation ppp
 ppp multilink
 ppp multilink group 1
 max-reserved-bandwidth 100
!
interface Serial0/1/0
 no ip address
 encapsulation ppp
 ppp multilink
 ppp multilink group 1
 max-reserved-bandwidth 100
!
interface Serial0/2/0
 no ip address
 encapsulation ppp
 ppp multilink
 ppp multilink group 1
 max-reserved-bandwidth 100
JamieC_APEXAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

kdearingCommented:
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
cstosgaleCommented:
Based on the config above, a service policy is configured. It is within this service policy that fair queueing would be enabled if you were to use it. Fair queueing will help balance traffic flows, but is only really affective on lower speed links.

There is no need to disable fair queueing on the interfaces themselves, I believe it is disabled by default on any interfaces with a bandwith of more than 2 Mb, but this won't interfere with CBWFQ anyway.

I wouldn't recommend using the maximum-reserved-bandwith command however, this will allow you to allocate 100% of the bandwith in CBWFQ, something Cisco do not recommend.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Routers

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.