Simplifying my select statement

I have a query defined which needs to calculate averages for differtent parts of a questionnaire. There are now 1000 records in for testing, but the real db contains over 40000 already.
My sql statement now takes like minutes to load for only those 1000 records.

Does anyone have any tips on simplifying the sql statement.

QuestionnaireOffline contains the results from the query with also CodePostal, the table CodePostal contains the province. I need to get overview of the responses per province.
SELECT DISTINCT (SELECT Count(*) FROM QuestionnaireOffline WHERE CodePostal IN (SELECT CP FROM CodesPostal WHERE Province='BRABANT WALLON')) AS nTotal, (SELECT count(*) FROM QuestionnaireOffline WHERE mode = "Papier" AND CodePostal IN (SELECT CP FROM CodesPostal WHERE Province='BRABANT WALLON')) AS nPapier, (SELECT count(*) FROM QuestionnaireOffline WHERE mode = "Internet" AND CodePostal IN (SELECT CP FROM CodesPostal WHERE Province='BRABANT WALLON')) AS nInternet, ...
 
FROM QuestionnaireOffline;

Open in new window

pmelkebekeAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Patrick MatthewsCommented:
SELECT Count(q.CodePostal) AS nTotal, Sum(IIf(q.mode = "Papier", 1, 0) AS nPapier,
    Sum(IIf(q.mode = "Internet", 1, 0) AS nInternet, ...
FROM QuestionnaireOffline q INNER JOIN
    CodesPostal c ON q.CodePostal = c.CP
WHERE c.Province = "BRABANT WALLON"
0
pmelkebekeAuthor Commented:
I'm missing some kind of a DISTINCT in this picture. The total is way too high.
I have 5 different provinces. If i ran this query on my data then the total amount is way higher than the no of records I have.

I must say, If i sum all the results I get the same number of records as I have when I query (without DISTINCT) in a wrongly way like this:
SELECT * FROM QUESTIONNAIREOFFLINE, Codespostal WHERE Codepostal = CP

Open in new window

0
Patrick MatthewsCommented:
pmelkebeke,

It would be useful to see some sample data.  EE now allows you to directly upload
files to your question.

Please be advised that once you upload a file, it can be publicly accessed, and that it
may not be possible to fully and permanently delete it.  Therefore, be very careful about
posting proprietary, confidential, or other sensitive information.  If necessary, use "fake"
and/or obfuscated data in your sample.

Regards,

Patrick
0
Ultimate Tool Kit for Technology Solution Provider

Broken down into practical pointers and step-by-step instructions, the IT Service Excellence Tool Kit delivers expert advice for technology solution providers. Get your free copy now.

Arthur_WoodCommented:
This query
SELECT * FROM QUESTIONNAIREOFFLINE, Codespostal WHERE Codepostal = CP
may not work as you expect.  You will get a 'CARTESIAN JOIN'  between the two tables. It should read:
SELECT QUESTIONNAIREOFFLINE.* FROM QUESTIONNAIREOFFLINE JOIN Codespostal on QUESTIONNAIREOFFLINE.CodePostal = Codespostal.CP  
0
pmelkebekeAuthor Commented:
Okay, here it is.
EE-demodata.mdb
0
pmelkebekeAuthor Commented:
Arthur,

I know this. That's why I posted it. The result I get with the first proposal gives the same results as this cartesian join result...
0
Patrick MatthewsCommented:
pmelkebeke,

The problem is that CodesPostal has >1 record for each post code

Regards,

Patrick
0
Patrick MatthewsCommented:
This seems to be working against the sample data:

SELECT Count(*) AS nTotal, Sum(IIf(q.Mode = "Papier", 1, 0)) AS nPapier, Sum(IIf(q.Mode = "Internet", 1, 0)) AS nInternet
FROM QuestionnaireOffline q INNER JOIN
    (SELECT c.CP, Max(c.Province) AS Prov FROM CodesPostal c GROUP BY c.CP) cc ON q.CodePostal = cc.CP
WHERE cc.Prov = "BRABANT WALLON";
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
pmelkebekeAuthor Commented:
Thank you very much for this solution. I saw indeed that there were more results for some postal codes and I fixed it by using a query which filters out the doubles and using that one in the solution query. Thank you very much for the solution.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Query Syntax

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.