Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 3932
  • Last Modified:

How To - multi dimensional ArrayList of 2 ArrayLists ????

Experts:

What's the (best) way/syntax to create an Array/ArrayList/List that consists of 2 ArrayLists?  
Example:

List<someObject> oldObject = new ArrayList<someObject>();
List<someObject> newObject = new ArrayList<someObject>();
// do stuff
// I want to return a Array/ArrayList/List containing
// List<someObject> oldObject, List<someObject> newObject
// something like this:  someObject[][] = new someObject[oldObject.size][newObject.size];
Anybody know how to do that?
0
pdlarue
Asked:
pdlarue
  • 6
  • 4
1 Solution
 
sciuriwareCommented:
     ArrayList[] a2 = new ArrayList[2];
      a2[0] = new ArrayList<String>();
      a2[1] = new ArrayList<String>();

JAVA refuses to create a generic 2 dimensional List-family,

List<String>[] = new ArrayList<String>()[];  // Is not possible.

;JOOP!
0
 
sciuriwareCommented:
I meant:

List<String>[] = new ArrayList<String>()[2];  // Is not possible.

;JOOP!
0
 
pdlarueAuthor Commented:
OK.  Is it possible to create a multi-dimensional array that contains 2 ArrayLists?
0
VIDEO: THE CONCERTO CLOUD FOR HEALTHCARE

Modern healthcare requires a modern cloud. View this brief video to understand how the Concerto Cloud for Healthcare can help your organization.

 
pdlarueAuthor Commented:
Is it possible to use multidimensional HashMap?  Something like this:

myHashMap.put (key, object1, object2);
0
 
sciuriwareCommented:
Think: what would be the result of

        myHashMap.get(someKey) ??

It IS possible on the contrary to create a HashMap of HashMap's:

       HashMap<String, HashMap<String, MyObject>> h2 = new HashMap<String, HashMap>();

now you can:

       h2.put(thisKey, new HashMap<String, MyObject>());

;JOOP!
0
 
pdlarueAuthor Commented:
OK.  Your answers are great.  I know if anyone can point me in the right direction you can.  I may not be phrasing the question quite right.  This is the result I want.  Do you know of any way to do this?

newCustomer[0], oldCustomer[0]
newCustomer[1], oldCustomer[1]
newCustomer[2], oldCustomer[2]
newCustomer[3], oldCustomer[3]
newCustomer[4], oldCustomer[4]

   OR   (if HashMap is necessary)

"0",newCustomer[0], oldCustomer[0]
"1",newCustomer[1], oldCustomer[1]
"2",newCustomer[2], oldCustomer[2]
"3",newCustomer[3], oldCustomer[3]
"4",newCustomer[4], oldCustomer[4]


I am trying to bundlie this up in an Array or HashMap or something from the server-side code and send to the client-side code.  The gui developer is using Flex, which has the ability to get multiple objects in the same iteration (just like the first group of objects listed above).  Since this is a comparison between the old object and the new object (to include properties) the ListArrays will be the same size.

If you can tell me how to do this I'll bump up the points to 500.  Thank you for your help.
0
 
sciuriwareCommented:
A HashMap stores relations from 1 key to only 1 object.

You can of course put the next 'hidden' class at the bottom of your source:

class CustomerPair
{
     Customer oldC;
     Customer newC;

     public CustomerPair(Customer o, Customer n)
     {
          oldC = o;
          newC = n;
     }
}


now you can use code like this (ONLY IN THIS CLASS ABOVE THE HIDDEN CLASS!):

HashMap<String, CustomerPair> links = new HashMap<String, CustomerPair>();

// and:

links.put("Jensen", new CustomerPair(new Customer(p), new Customer(q)));

// Not very beautiful but it's a workable solution.
// And, please, don't praise me too much; I'm just an old programmer ..................

;JOOP!
0
 
sciuriwareCommented:
And, because one day you want the data back:

   CustomerPair t = links.get("Jensen");
   if(t != null)
   {
         Customer oldJensen = t.oldC;
.....

;JOOP!
0
 
pdlarueAuthor Commented:
Thank you.  I'll give it a try.
0
 
sciuriwareCommented:
Thanks, you gave me a promotion.

;JOOP!
0

Featured Post

What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

  • 6
  • 4
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now