Solved

SATA II only transfers 25MB/sec to a raid 5?

Posted on 2008-10-29
5
297 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-29
Running Vista Ultimate x64. XFX680iLT MB q6600, 4 gig ram, 3 WD green power SATA II drives in a raid 5.  I have a 1TB WD green power SATA II running through esata.  Here is my question.  When copying from my eSATA to the raid 5 i'm only getting about 20-25megabytes /sec.  Does that sound right.  If sata 2 is supposed to be 3Gb, shouldn't my copy rate be faster?  Any ideas?
0
Comment
Question by:domsdabomb
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 7

Accepted Solution

by:
jdietrich earned 250 total points
ID: 22841128
Yes, that seems a little low.  But remember, the 3 Gig is internal transfer rate, not external.  Also, Raid V is very poor for writes.  It spreads the data across the drives but due to the over head of parity (for recovery) it is not particularly ideal for writes.  Striping is the fastest as it uses all the drive controllers in tandem, however there is no fault tolerance.  Make sure you are using quality cables that are well shielded.  I would have thought your transfer rate would be closer to double.  Why not try the opposite, to see if it is the raid.  Copy from the raid to the esata.  Usually reads from raid V are better than writes....

JD
0
 
LVL 30

Assisted Solution

by:Duncan Meyers
Duncan Meyers earned 250 total points
ID: 22849428
20 - 25MB/sec isn't too bad. You can expect about 8 - 10MB/sec on a SATA drive for a typical mix of random and sequential data. And you're not going to like the write performance. RAID 5 suffers the RAID 5 write penalty - for every host write, the RAID controller must:
- Read the original data
- Read the original parity
- XOR the original parity with the new data to create the new parity
- Write the new parity
- Write the new data
So there are four disc operations for every host write. That can be a real performance killer if your RAID controller doesn't have write cache or the write cache fills up. Read operations on a RAID 5 set do not suffer the penalty and will usually give pretty good performance, but you should be aware that SATA drives sitting next to each other affect each other, and therefor affect the performance (see the article noted below for more information).

This is an excellent article that explains the difference between enterprise and personal storage, and why you won't git a gazillion MB/sec off SATA: http://www.seagate.com/content/docs/pdf/whitepaper/D2c_More_than_Interface_ATA_vs_SCSI_042003.pdf
0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:Duncan Meyers
ID: 22849451
0

Featured Post

Best Practices: Disaster Recovery Testing

Besides backup, any IT division should have a disaster recovery plan. You will find a few tips below relating to the development of such a plan and to what issues one should pay special attention in the course of backup planning.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

NTFS file system has been developed by Microsoft that is widely used by Windows NT operating system and its advanced versions. It is the mostly used over FAT file system as it provides superior features like reliability, security, storage, efficienc…
When you start your Windows 10 PC and got an "Operating system not found" error or just saw  "Auto repair for startup" or a blinking cursor with black screen. A loop for Auto repair will start but fix nothing.  You will be panic as there are no back…
Windows 8 comes with a dramatically different user interface known as Metro. Notably missing from the new interface is a Start button and Start Menu. Many users do not like it, much preferring the interface of earlier versions — Windows 7, Windows X…
This Micro Tutorial will give you a basic overview of Windows DVD Burner through its features and interface. This will be demonstrated using Windows 7 operating system.

856 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question