Solved

SATA II only transfers 25MB/sec to a raid 5?

Posted on 2008-10-29
5
300 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-29
Running Vista Ultimate x64. XFX680iLT MB q6600, 4 gig ram, 3 WD green power SATA II drives in a raid 5.  I have a 1TB WD green power SATA II running through esata.  Here is my question.  When copying from my eSATA to the raid 5 i'm only getting about 20-25megabytes /sec.  Does that sound right.  If sata 2 is supposed to be 3Gb, shouldn't my copy rate be faster?  Any ideas?
0
Comment
Question by:domsdabomb
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 7

Accepted Solution

by:
jdietrich earned 250 total points
ID: 22841128
Yes, that seems a little low.  But remember, the 3 Gig is internal transfer rate, not external.  Also, Raid V is very poor for writes.  It spreads the data across the drives but due to the over head of parity (for recovery) it is not particularly ideal for writes.  Striping is the fastest as it uses all the drive controllers in tandem, however there is no fault tolerance.  Make sure you are using quality cables that are well shielded.  I would have thought your transfer rate would be closer to double.  Why not try the opposite, to see if it is the raid.  Copy from the raid to the esata.  Usually reads from raid V are better than writes....

JD
0
 
LVL 30

Assisted Solution

by:Duncan Meyers
Duncan Meyers earned 250 total points
ID: 22849428
20 - 25MB/sec isn't too bad. You can expect about 8 - 10MB/sec on a SATA drive for a typical mix of random and sequential data. And you're not going to like the write performance. RAID 5 suffers the RAID 5 write penalty - for every host write, the RAID controller must:
- Read the original data
- Read the original parity
- XOR the original parity with the new data to create the new parity
- Write the new parity
- Write the new data
So there are four disc operations for every host write. That can be a real performance killer if your RAID controller doesn't have write cache or the write cache fills up. Read operations on a RAID 5 set do not suffer the penalty and will usually give pretty good performance, but you should be aware that SATA drives sitting next to each other affect each other, and therefor affect the performance (see the article noted below for more information).

This is an excellent article that explains the difference between enterprise and personal storage, and why you won't git a gazillion MB/sec off SATA: http://www.seagate.com/content/docs/pdf/whitepaper/D2c_More_than_Interface_ATA_vs_SCSI_042003.pdf
0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:Duncan Meyers
ID: 22849451
0

Featured Post

Edgartown IT Case Study

Learn about Edgartown's quest to ensure the safety and security of the entire town's employee and citizen data. Read the case study!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

A project that enables an administrator to perform actions within a user session context not just at the time of login but any time later on day(s) or week(s) later.
When asking a question in a forum or creating documentation, screenshots are vital tools that can convey a lot more information and save you and your reader a lot of time
Windows 10 is mostly good. However the one thing that annoys me is how many clicks you have to do to dial a VPN connection. You have to go to settings from the start menu, (2 clicks), Network and Internet (1 click), Click VPN (another click) then fi…
Finding and deleting duplicate (picture) files can be a time consuming task. My wife and I, our three kids and their families all share one dilemma: Managing our pictures. Between desktops, laptops, phones, tablets, and cameras; over the last decade…

695 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question