Solved

Looking for suggestions to set up a sound exchange environment with redundancy and failover

Posted on 2008-10-30
3
236 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-30
We have a company with multiple sites running exchange 2003.  There are two email servers. The main server at the corperate office, and a back up server at a smaller remote site.  We are trying to find a solution to implement that would involve email redundancy and fail over.  If the main email server goes down, have all new mail forwarded to the back up server and distributed.  Also when the main email server is down, the clients are able to get their contacts and calendars.  I know it's alot to digest, but would appreciate any suggestions.  Thanks!
0
Comment
Question by:drinaldi
3 Comments
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:bcrosby007
ID: 22840823
First you would have to set up replication between the two exchange servers. Then create separate MX records for each server with the primary having priority. When the primary goes down, the secondary takes over after a few seconds of "lag".
0
 
LVL 11

Accepted Solution

by:
sandeep_narkhede earned 250 total points
ID: 22840826
With Exchange Server 2003, I think you need to implement a third party product, there are a lot available & following are the links for few

http://www.doubletake.com/english/products/geocluster/Pages/default.aspx
http://www.xosoft.com/products/WANSyncExchange.htm

Read Microsoft suggestions for implementing the above though

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996051(EXCHG.65).aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124066.aspx
0
 
LVL 19

Assisted Solution

by:MrLonandB
MrLonandB earned 250 total points
ID: 22841314
sandeep is right. You can run Exchange clustering, Doubletake or something similiar...and you can get in to some high costs with those. But that's the way to do it. Any other attempt at failover is going to require manual intervention and leg-work...no matter how you slice the pie.

It's a never-ending round-robin...when there's a mail server failure, management wants some kind of redundancy to prevent a future outage. You then offer them the solution they want so that there is uninterrupted failover and invariably that will be said to "cost too much - isn't there something else we can do?".  And about the only thing you can do, is to have another server up and running at all times, or loaded and ready to bring on-line in the event of failure...which basically just saves you the time of having to build one in the case of catastrophy.
0

Featured Post

Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
unable to book room mailbox after get moved to Office365 6 48
exchange 13 25
Removing Exchange 2003 3 17
Restored mailboxes and OST 11 39
This article explains in simple steps how to renew expiring Exchange Server Internal Transport Certificate.
This article aims to explain the working of CircularLogArchiver. This tool was designed to solve the buildup of log file in cases where systems do not support circular logging or where circular logging is not enabled
In this video we show how to create a Contact in Exchange 2013. We show this process by using the Exchange Admin Center. Log into Exchange Admin Center.: First we need to log into the Exchange Admin Center. Navigate to the Recipients >> Contact ta…
In this video we show how to create a Resource Mailbox in Exchange 2013. We show this process by using the Exchange Admin Center. Log into Exchange Admin Center.: Navigate to the Recipients >> Resources tab.: "Recipients" is our default selection …

730 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question