Solved

MS Access Forms with Multiple Record Sources

Posted on 2008-10-31
5
925 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-28
Is it possible to include data from multiple record sources in one of my MS Access forms? What I have is a form that I use to assign id codes to client invoices, and I have two queries. One looks like "select * from work_done where invoice_num is null and client_id=[Client ID]" and the other is "select [complicated string manipulation expression] from work_done where client_id=[Client ID] and invoice_num is not null" (it generates the invoice's id code from the date, the client's name, how many previous invoices I sent out this month, etc.). Both share the same [Client ID] parameter and it's the only parameter for both queries.

The problem is that in the Form properties, there only seems to be room for one record source. My question is how do I get two different record sources into my form? (I can't combine them into a single query, I don't think, because one query returns only the rows with null invoice_num and the other needs the non-null invoice_num .)
0
Comment
Question by:tjgquicken
  • 3
5 Comments
 
LVL 77

Expert Comment

by:peter57r
ID: 22850785
If you are selecting different fields - as you appear to be doing- then you should see if you can use a use a main form /subform structure.

If you were selecting the same fields then probably you would use a union query to bring the two results into a single list.
0
 
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:LennyGray
ID: 22851045
This comment is not for points.....................

If you expect to add or change data in any or all of the individual tables, then you should have a subform for each dataset. The Master/Child properties of each subform will synchronize the data in each subform based upon the main table (where the Client information is displayed).

If you are simply displaying data, then peter57's solution for the union query is the most efficient.

Good Luck!!
Lenny Gray
0
 

Author Comment

by:tjgquicken
ID: 22851622
I think my problem here is that one of my queries returns a collection of rows, while the other one returns a single value. The union query doesn't seem to like that.
0
 
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:LennyGray
ID: 22851809
the union query requires that the structures of ALL tables/queries being merged are exactly the same.
0
 
LVL 10

Accepted Solution

by:
LennyGray earned 250 total points
ID: 22851814
Use multiple subforms, then
0

Featured Post

Enterprise Mobility and BYOD For Dummies

Like “For Dummies” books, you can read this in whatever order you choose and learn about mobility and BYOD; and how to put a competitive mobile infrastructure in place. Developed for SMBs and large enterprises alike, you will find helpful use cases, planning, and implementation.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Introduction When developing Access applications, often we need to know whether an object exists.  This article presents a quick and reliable routine to determine if an object exists without that object being opened. If you wanted to inspect/ite…
QuickBooks® has a great invoice interface that we were happy with for a while but that changed in 2001 through no fault of Intuit®. Our industry's unit names are dictated by RUS: the Rural Utilities Services division of USDA. Contracts contain un…
Familiarize people with the process of utilizing SQL Server views from within Microsoft Access. Microsoft Access is a very powerful client/server development tool. One of the SQL Server objects that you can interact with from within Microsoft Access…
In Microsoft Access, learn how to use Dlookup and other domain aggregate functions and one method of specifying a string value within a string. Specify the first argument, which is the expression to be returned: Specify the second argument, which …

809 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question