Outward flux of surface

Posted on 2008-10-31
Medium Priority
Last Modified: 2012-05-05
Consider the parametric curve: (sinh(t), cosh(t)), -1 <= t <= 1.
Revolve it about the x-axis to form a 3D surface, S.
I'm asked to use the Divergence Theorem to find the volume of the shape.

Obviously, if we choose f=(x,y,z), then div f = 3, and so:

(Volume Integral over V) div f = 3 * Volume of shape

and so, by the Divergence Theorem:

Volume of shape = 1/3 * (Surface Integral over S, D+, and D-) f dot N

where D+ and D- are the flat discs/surfaces either side of the shape, and N is the surface normal.

If I calculate and sum the surface integrals for D+ and D-, I get: 2*Pi*Sinh(1)*Cosh^2(1). This part seems trivial.

However, I don't seem to get an integrable function when I attempt to integrate f dot N over S.

Here's the basic outline of my attempt:

Expressing the surface parametrically in terms of (u,t):

 x = t, y = Sqrt(1 + t^2)*Cos(u), z = Sqrt(1 + t^2)*Sin(u).

So, f = (x,y,z) = (t, Sqrt(1+t^2)*Cos(u), Sqrt(1+t^2)*Sin(u)).

Then I calculate the surface normal to be:
N = [t, -Sqrt(1+t^2)*Cos^2(u), -Sqrt(1+t^2)*Sin(u)] / Sqrt(2+Cos(2u)).

And then f dot N seems to simplify to:

f dot N = -1 / Sqrt(2 + Cos(2u)).

However, first of all, this doesn't seem easily integrable (elliptic function, blah blah?), but secondly, doesn't seem to depend on t (which I would expect of it).

So I'm guessing I've gone wrong somewhere. Does anyone get the surface normal to be different to me? Or, f dot N? Perhaps there's a more suitable parameterization?

Any help would be much appreciated, thanks.

Question by:InteractiveMind
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
LVL 25

Author Comment

ID: 22854650
Ah, I had forgotten to calculate the Jacobian. I get it to be:

Jacobian = 1 + t^2.

And so I need to find:

(Integral over S) (1+t^2) / Sqrt(2 + Cos(2u)),

but this still seems wrong (tooo difficult).
LVL 25

Accepted Solution

InteractiveMind earned 0 total points
ID: 22867149
Parameterise the surface as such:

alpha(t,u) = (sinh(t), cosh(t)*cos(u), cosh(t)*sin(u))

and don't normalise the surface normal. The integrate ends up as -cosh(t).

Featured Post

Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Introduction On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate our Product? Many of us have answered that question time and time again. But only a few of us have had the pleasure of receiving a stack of the filled out surveys and being asked to do somethi…
When we purchase storage, we typically are advertised storage of 500GB, 1TB, 2TB and so on. However, when you actually install it into your computer, your 500GB HDD will actually show up as 465GB. Why? It has to do with the way people and computers…
Although Jacob Bernoulli (1654-1705) has been credited as the creator of "Binomial Distribution Table", Gottfried Leibniz (1646-1716) did his dissertation on the subject in 1666; Leibniz you may recall is the co-inventor of "Calculus" and beat Isaac…
Finds all prime numbers in a range requested and places them in a public primes() array. I've demostrated a template size of 30 (2 * 3 * 5) but larger templates can be built such 210  (2 * 3 * 5 * 7) or 2310  (2 * 3 * 5 * 7 * 11). The larger templa…
Suggested Courses
Course of the Month14 days, 23 hours left to enroll

770 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question