Need more ip addresses

We are currently setup on the 192.168.100.X 255.255.255.0. We have more devices currently than we have available IP addresses. We have been talked to about load balancing, supernetting vs. subnetting.... all of which sails just over our heads. We are in a critical situation as we have classrooms of students with no connection to computers making school tough. We are looking for a detailed solution that will allow all students to use our server, networked printers and internet connection. Any help would be grand.....
jrsnorkAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

jazzIIIloveCommented:
>>Need more ip addresses

virtual IP is what you are in search for:

An IP address that is shared among multiple domain names or multiple servers. Virtual IP addressing enables one IP address to be used either when insufficient IP addresses are available or as a means to balance traffic to multiple servers in a server farm.

How to configure:

http://www.adventnet.com/products/simulator/help/sim_network/netsim_conf_virtual_ip.html
0
cyberseanCommented:
There are quite a few different options, but it basically down comes down to subnetting.  You say that you are on the 192.168.100.x network.  This is a Class C subnet and only offers 254 devices.  (0-255 = 256 minus one for the network and minus one for broadcast = 254 devices)  To keep it short and sweet, I would change to the 172.16.x.x network.  Your network would be 172.16.x.x with a subnet mask of 255.255.0.0.  This is a class B subnet and gives you around 65,535 devices.  Like I said though, there are so many different ways to subnet your existing network.  You mentioned that the basic stuff sails over your head.  With that in mind, I would really just recommend an onsite computer guy or networking company to come out and set it up for you.  You should expect to pay about $75 to $100 hour for them to come out.  
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
jrsnorkAuthor Commented:
is it as simple as changing our setup to 172.16.x.x with a subnet of 255.255.0.0 and letting our DHCP server pass out the addresses we need? What are the draw backs of this setup?
0
Powerful Yet Easy-to-Use Network Monitoring

Identify excessive bandwidth utilization or unexpected application traffic with SolarWinds Bandwidth Analyzer Pack.

cyberseanCommented:
It is as simple as changing to the 172.16.x.x network, but it may involve alot of work.  So simple yes, quick maybe/maybe not.  There are some other considerations that may be unique to your situation.  You'll want to make sure you move all static ips to that network, change the scope of your dhcp server, change the options (such as dns server settings, default gateway, etc) on the new dhcp scope.  Is your dns server setup for dynamic updates?  If not, you'll have to manually update dns records.  Do you have any client computer applications that connect to a server by ip instead of name (because they will need to be configured to point to that server's new ip)?  I really don't really see any long term drawbacks of any serious significance.  If anything, your broadcasts will generate more traffic as it will be sent out to every node that is connected.  However, you really don't have that many nodes to deal with, so the increased traffic will be slight.  (to avoid this, you could set up multiple networks and route between them.  such as one network of 192.168.100.x and another as 192.168.101.x.  That involves a whole bunch of other considerations as well).  I think switching to a class b network is the simplest for your situation.  Once you get all the basic configurations complete, you'll be set for a long time before you start running into issues with the one BIG network.
0
RowleyCommented:
I'd keep the /24 and start routing between networks. Start the 192.168.101/24 and route between them on your core switches. It's going to be a *lot* less painful than switching to a /16 (255.255.0.0) mask, and being a school network administrator, I bet your lot are already seriously overworked and underpaid.

It's not as simple as changing your scope addresses by the way. You'll need to change your entire network addressing assignments on each host, update naming services, ensure there are no hard coded addresses in applications anywhere, flush all cache's...some basics of the top of my head - no trivial thing.
0
jrsnorkAuthor Commented:
Ok the routing between is seeming a better solution as we are yes overworked and underpaid. Also hiring outside is not in our budget which is why I am here asking all of you. So what is needed to route between two networks?
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
TCP/IP

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.