• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 735
  • Last Modified:

ASA5520 -- Which is more CPU intensive? Deny ACLs or Object-groups?

I need to block all traffic entering our network from an MPLS interface destined to a handful of "protected" subnets (mostly RFC 1918) but allow it out the Internet interface...Which of these is least cpu intensive, or is there perhaps a better way to do this?

1)  Make an object-group that contains all of the subnets I want to allow traffic to (all non-RFC 1918 addresses) and let the implicity deny at the end handle blocking traffic to the "protected" subnets, or
2)  Make an object-group that contains all of the RFC 1918 subnets and place an explicit deny ACL above the "permit any any" ACLs?

....also....is it generally better to use object-groups or separate ACLs, strictly from a performance perspective?

mpls--------ASA---------internet
 (5)               |                 (0)
                    |
                 client
                  (10)

security-levels in ():

0
j4llen
Asked:
j4llen
1 Solution
 
j4llenAuthor Commented:
I just realized what a stupid question this is -- I can much more easily filter out the blocks I want to deny than allow all the blocks in between....I just don't like the idea of Deny ACLs since their placement in the ACL stack matters, and its easy for somebody to miss something later down the road....I guess I was wondering if there's a better way to do what I'm trying to do....

anyways, I'll keep this open to answer that and my other question:

is it generally better to use object-groups or separate ACLs, strictly from a performance perspective?
0
 
lrmooreCommented:
Personally, I like using object groups because you can add/remove individual networks/hosts with a couple mouse clicks without having to re-create the access-list each time.
Yes, placement matters, but you only have to place it once using a group.
unless you have hundreds of entries, I wouldn't worry about CPU on the 5520. It can take it and not even breath hard.
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Increase Security & Decrease Risk with NSPM Tools

Analyst firm, Enterprise Management Associates (EMA) reveals significant benefits to enterprises when using Network Security Policy Management (NSPM) solutions, while organizations without, experienced issues including non standard security policies and failed cloud migrations

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now