[Okta Webinar] Learn how to a build a cloud-first strategyRegister Now

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 243
  • Last Modified:

SQL Server cluster: Why wouldn't I want SQL Server in the 'Cluster Group'?

On our clusters we've followed the best practice of putting all SQL Server resources in their own cluster group. The problem is that now we see instances where something will cause SQL Server to fail so the SQL Server group fails over to the other node while the Windows cluster resources remain on the first node. Why would I want that? It seems to me that I want one node to own both the SQL Server and Windows cluster resources at all times.

Thanks
0
pteddy
Asked:
pteddy
  • 3
  • 3
1 Solution
 
tigin44Commented:
At SQL Server 200 clusters if any resource fails, all the node resourses failover to the other node. But At SQL Sever 2005 this not the default case. There is a property for the resources named "Affect the node", when you right click on cluster resources and select properties you can find it... Check them to affect the rosource group.
0
 
pteddyAuthor Commented:
tigin44 - Thanks for your response. I don't see the "affect the node" option you mentioned. In the advanced tab of the resource's properties there is an "affect the group" option but that still would not fail over all the groups.

Thanks
0
 
tigin44Commented:
forgive me,  it should be "affect the group" as you mentioned. By checking this boxex on the resources you instruct the cluster to move all the resources to the other node id any of the resources fail. You may exclude such the resources full text search or sql agent to cause the group to failover.
0
Concerto Cloud for Software Providers & ISVs

Can Concerto Cloud Services help you focus on evolving your application offerings, while delivering the best cloud experience to your customers? From DevOps to revenue models and customer support, the answer is yes!

Learn how Concerto can help you.

 
pteddyAuthor Commented:
But that would not address the problem we have. If SQL Server fails and the cluster service moves the group it will still leave the other cluster groups on the original node, right?

Thanks
0
 
tigin44Commented:
if their resources didnt failed then they will stay in where they are. moving groups is not good, since moving operation alll users lost their connection ad your SQL server service takes some time to start up again. Why do you want the other groups to move to the other nodes as well?
0
 
pteddyAuthor Commented:
well from an organizational viewpoint I want to have all my resources on the same machine. If some are on one machine and some on others I'm not basically dealing with an active/active cluster instead of active/passive.

At any rate, it doesn't sound like what I want is possible.

Thanks
0

Featured Post

Efficient way to get backups off site to Azure

This user guide provides instructions on how to deploy and configure both a StoneFly Scale Out NAS Enterprise Cloud Drive virtual machine and Veeam Cloud Connect in the Microsoft Azure Cloud.

  • 3
  • 3
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now