SQL Server cluster: Why wouldn't I want SQL Server in the 'Cluster Group'?

On our clusters we've followed the best practice of putting all SQL Server resources in their own cluster group. The problem is that now we see instances where something will cause SQL Server to fail so the SQL Server group fails over to the other node while the Windows cluster resources remain on the first node. Why would I want that? It seems to me that I want one node to own both the SQL Server and Windows cluster resources at all times.

Thanks
pteddyAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
tigin44Connect With a Mentor Commented:
if their resources didnt failed then they will stay in where they are. moving groups is not good, since moving operation alll users lost their connection ad your SQL server service takes some time to start up again. Why do you want the other groups to move to the other nodes as well?
0
 
tigin44Commented:
At SQL Server 200 clusters if any resource fails, all the node resourses failover to the other node. But At SQL Sever 2005 this not the default case. There is a property for the resources named "Affect the node", when you right click on cluster resources and select properties you can find it... Check them to affect the rosource group.
0
 
pteddyAuthor Commented:
tigin44 - Thanks for your response. I don't see the "affect the node" option you mentioned. In the advanced tab of the resource's properties there is an "affect the group" option but that still would not fail over all the groups.

Thanks
0
Cloud Class® Course: Microsoft Windows 7 Basic

This introductory course to Windows 7 environment will teach you about working with the Windows operating system. You will learn about basic functions including start menu; the desktop; managing files, folders, and libraries.

 
tigin44Commented:
forgive me,  it should be "affect the group" as you mentioned. By checking this boxex on the resources you instruct the cluster to move all the resources to the other node id any of the resources fail. You may exclude such the resources full text search or sql agent to cause the group to failover.
0
 
pteddyAuthor Commented:
But that would not address the problem we have. If SQL Server fails and the cluster service moves the group it will still leave the other cluster groups on the original node, right?

Thanks
0
 
pteddyAuthor Commented:
well from an organizational viewpoint I want to have all my resources on the same machine. If some are on one machine and some on others I'm not basically dealing with an active/active cluster instead of active/passive.

At any rate, it doesn't sound like what I want is possible.

Thanks
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.