NIC Teaming

I'm currently managing a infrastructure with DELL PowerEdge servers. I do alot of virtualization using virtual server 2005 and hyper V. Some of these servers have Broadcom and some have Intel NICs. I'd like to implement teaming, mainly for failover/fault tolerance.

I've been reading  upon the different teaming modes but I am not completely sure which one I want to implement.

Adapter fault tolerance seems the simplest. My understanding is that 2 nics, one is active other is standby. the IP address is assigned to the active and if it fails it gets passed to the standby.

Then there is switch fault tolerance, which seems to do the same thing. But, what's the difference amongst the 2?

And the main question is, why not do adaptive load balancing to increase traffic throughput on 2 nics, but if one fails everything will still function?

I am going to use 2 Procurve 2810 switches connected to a Cisco ASA5505. Do I need to configure anything special on any of the devices?

LVL 5
shankshankAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

65tdRetiredCommented:
If using server as a VM Host I would remove virtual networking from one nic so the host has a dedicated nic.
The remaining nic set with just virtual networking and all other clients and service unchecked.
Add nics and configure the same as the second nic and load balance as a trunk over the virtual switch.
0
shankshankAuthor Commented:
Yeah right now on my dual port one nic is for host only and the other nic has all tcp ip properties removed so it's dedicated to the virtual network.
in the past if i didn't do this i noticed sometimes i lose connectivity to the host.

"Add nics and configure the same as the second nic and load balance as a trunk over the virtual switch."
i'm not understanding what you mean here..
0
65tdRetiredCommented:
The current configuration should not be teamed.
If network cards are added then teaming or trunking or  load balancing the VM traffic could be considered.
Were you wanting team the host nic?
0
shankshankAuthor Commented:
I don't need trunking since all servers on the physical server are part of the same VLAN.

I do have 4 ports, dual broadcom and dual intel.

I was thinking dual broadcom set up as a team for the virtual servers.
0
65tdRetiredCommented:
The attached doc has a good explanation of teaming by Dell (Brodacom), if network traffic is high enough to require load balancing then I guess it would be required, have only used the NFT as it never gave as any issues, ether channel and like load balancing did not work well in our environment, al receive traffic ended coming in on one nic.


http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/network/P29352/English/teamsvcs.htm
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Networking Hardware-Other

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.