Avatar of devon-lad
devon-lad

asked on 

Maximum storage one Windows server can deal with?

I know this is very much like "how long is a piece of string", however...

Is it reasonable to assume that one rack server with 4GB RAM,  2 x Quad core Xeon 3GHz processors, running Windows 2003 or 2008, would be able to cope with 20TB of iSCSI storage?

This is for a new offsite backup facility, so the bottleneck is going to be the internet connection.  However, if the 100Mbps leased line was working at full capacity, would the one server be able to cope?

Seems to me that it could, although I realise that it would be prudent to have a failover server of similar spec.

Any thoughts?
StorageWindows Server 2008Windows Server 2003

Avatar of undefined
Last Comment
chuckyh
SOLUTION
Avatar of drpoppers
drpoppers

Blurred text
THIS SOLUTION IS ONLY AVAILABLE TO MEMBERS.
View this solution by signing up for a free trial.
Members can start a 7-Day free trial and enjoy unlimited access to the platform.
See Pricing Options
Start Free Trial
Avatar of devon-lad
devon-lad

ASKER

Well, it would be on iSCSI units with Gb connections - which are SAN-like as they work at the block level, but perhaps not true SAN.

Although I'm fairly new to the mass storage arena, so maybe I've mixed by terms up.
Avatar of devon-lad
devon-lad

ASKER

Mixed MY terms up I mean
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of chuckyh
chuckyh
Flag of United States of America image

Blurred text
THIS SOLUTION IS ONLY AVAILABLE TO MEMBERS.
View this solution by signing up for a free trial.
Members can start a 7-Day free trial and enjoy unlimited access to the platform.
Avatar of devon-lad
devon-lad

ASKER

Thanks for that.

One statement that needs clarifying from that link.

"You cannot use the GPT partitioning style on removable media, or on cluster disks that are connected to shared SCSI or Fibre Channel buses used by the Cluster service"

Would iSCSI be classed as a shared SCSI bus?
Avatar of devon-lad
devon-lad

ASKER

Oh wait a minute, it's talking about cluster disks - which I guess doesn't apply unless you specifically setup a disk cluster.
Avatar of chuckyh
chuckyh
Flag of United States of America image

yeah that's for clusters. not what you are doing.
Windows Server 2003
Windows Server 2003

Windows Server 2003 was based on Windows XP and was released in four editions: Web, Standard, Enterprise and Datacenter. It also had derivative versions for clusters, storage and Microsoft’s Small Business Server. Important upgrades included integrating Internet Information Services (IIS), improvements to Active Directory (AD) and Group Policy (GP), and the migration to Automated System Recovery (ASR).

129K
Questions
--
Followers
--
Top Experts
Get a personalized solution from industry experts
Ask the experts
Read over 600 more reviews

TRUSTED BY

IBM logoIntel logoMicrosoft logoUbisoft logoSAP logo
Qualcomm logoCitrix Systems logoWorkday logoErnst & Young logo
High performer badgeUsers love us badge
LinkedIn logoFacebook logoX logoInstagram logoTikTok logoYouTube logo