• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 388
  • Last Modified:

SBS Load Balance

Hi all, trust you are well.

One of these questions that dont have a right or wrong answer i dont think, but more a good advice please.

I have a client who has been running an SBS 2003 since 2003. Server is an old Dual CPU Pentium 3 with a couple of SCSI Drives.

Over time they have grown to 40users, added AutoCad Vault, Accounting Package, SQL Database, Access database etc etc.

Server is really slowing down, and hard drive activity is constantly high.

Looking at improving, would you build a whole new awesome server with 15k drives etc and go through the whole process of migrating the SBS (SBS Migration) and setting up workstations again, or would you suggest an additional server or two running windows server 2003/8 standard and move off the accounts or databases or users shared folder etc keeping the exchange and AD on the original server?

Thanks
Sean

0
SeanNij
Asked:
SeanNij
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
2 Solutions
 
ormerodrutterCommented:
I believe replacing the server with a "state of the art" one is the best way forward, in terms of costs. May be you can get away with having an additional server and took the Access & Accounting package off the original one but I would automatically recommend you to consider replacing a 5 year old server anyway, in particular it has a P3 processor.

Migration is not that bad if you plan it thoroughly. If it is the first time you doing this I recommend you spend $200 on a migration tool called Swing-it. You can have a look on this website http://www.sbsmigration.com - if you do a search on Expert Exchange the tool is highly recommended by experts.

0
 
plug1Commented:
Well its a 6 year old server and if your looking after it then Id be looking to get rid before it costs you time and money. I would migrate evreyone to a new SBS box, you shouldnt have to do anything to the clients if you do it correctly.

Another (possibly better) option is to get a brand new super server and virtualise the existing SBS box, then create 1 or 2 new servers to deal with the excess workloads. Have them all runnning side by side on the new server.
0
 
ormerodrutterCommented:
Adding to my comment above ......

You can migrate to SBS2008. If you need SQL Server then you would get the Premium edition (I guess you are already using SBS2003 Premium if you are using SQL?). One feature of SBS2008 is it gives you an additional W2K8 server licence to put on an additional server and you can actually install the SQL Server part on this separate server, thus easing the workload on the SBS.
0
Cloud Class® Course: Microsoft Exchange Server

The MCTS: Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 certification validates your skills in supporting the maintenance and administration of the Exchange servers in an enterprise environment. Learn everything you need to know with this course.

 
SeanNijAuthor Commented:
On that thought - SBS 2008 - what should i use as a firewall then?
0
 
plug1Commented:
Your always going to be better off using and extrnal hardware based firewall, cisco, watchguard etc.
0
 
SeanNijAuthor Commented:
Thankyou!
0
 
ormerodrutterCommented:
If you are going for the Premium edition it comes with ISA. Or if you are using the Standard edition you can still buy ISA separately.

I think Cisco firewall would be quite expensive, so I would recommend SonicWall - I used TZ190 before and I think it is very afordable.
0
 
SeanNijAuthor Commented:
2008 premiun still come with ISA?
0
 
ormerodrutterCommented:
sorry my bad - it only comes in 2003
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Cloud Class® Course: C++ 11 Fundamentals

This course will introduce you to C++ 11 and teach you about syntax fundamentals.

  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now