Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of quickbytesteve
quickbytesteve

asked on

Troubleshooting an OC3 connection With A Watchguard Firewall

Hi.

We have a shared OC3 with an allocation of 100mbps. We do not use nearly that much pipe :-)

Our cio thinks the performance is not as good as it should be. The 1st results below indicate a 1.4% packet loss before the gateway, 2.7% after the first hop. Cogent (the provider) says this is patterned packet loss and is to be expected with the firewall. I find myself wondering about the latency. I was hoping to get some feedback on what these numbers should be, what kind of performance I should expect, and of course any tips. Some good windows testing ideas that don't involve ethereal would be great. Ethereals a little too much for me yet.

I cannot currently run tracert or pathping. This may have to do with the fact I am connecting by VPN at the moment, or some configuration we did on the firewall involving ICMP.

Thx
Steve

1. 10.2.2.1                                                                                      1.4%    74   10.9   5.6   1.7  64.0   7.9
 2. fa0-20.na01.b001353-0.jfk01.atlas.cogentco.com                                                2.7%    73    4.8   6.1   2.0  24.9   4.5
 3. gi1-46.3806.mpd01.jfk01.atlas.cogentco.com                                                    1.4%    73    3.8  18.6   1.9 211.6  43.0
 4. te2-1.ccr01.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com                                                          1.4%    73  151.2  21.7   1.9 226.0  45.9
 5. te4-2.mpd01.jfk05.atlas.cogentco.com                                                          2.7%    73  182.1  49.4   2.1 239.4  77.1
 6. te2-1.ccr02.jfk05.atlas.cogentco.com                                                          0.0%    73    2.8  16.9   2.1 197.8  36.5
 7. core1-0-0-8.lga.net.google.com                                                                0.0%    73    4.4  11.1   2.1  69.6  13.8

Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6001]
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

C:\Users\slastoe>ping 10.2.2.1

Pinging 10.2.2.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 10.2.2.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.2.2.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.2.2.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.2.2.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64

Ping statistics for 10.2.2.1: (gateway)
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 8ms, Average = 2ms


Pinging google.com [74.125.67.100] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 74.125.67.100: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=243
Reply from 74.125.67.100: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=243
Reply from 74.125.67.100: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=243
Reply from 74.125.67.100: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=243

Ping statistics for 74.125.67.100:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 19ms, Maximum = 27ms, Average = 21ms

Avatar of Ken Fayal
Ken Fayal
Flag of United States of America image

Just for the heck of it, try using www.speedtest.net.  Poke around trying different cities to see the performance there.
Avatar of quickbytesteve
quickbytesteve

ASKER

Thanks. I'm hoping for some more technical input than that though. Cheers.
Without being able to run tracert, you need other tools.  I would download Orion NPM 30 day trial from Solar Winds.  It's a powerful, but easy to use tool which lets you monitor network performance through firwalls and routers.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of quickbytesteve
quickbytesteve

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial