Types of mail enabled users/ contacts

Hi Guys

I have an application running that is set to email a Distribution List (DL1) when there is a problem. So far, the members of the DL are internal. The app owner would like an email also sent to the vendor (app@vendor.com) who is external to the company. So, there are two ways I can do this I guess;

a) Configure the SMTP mailer on the application with another To: address
b) Add app@vendor.com to DL1

I've been looking at the internet for various descriptions of mail enabled recipients, but I'm a bit confused between mailbox enabled recipients, mail enabled users, contacts, mail enabled users etc! We are running Exchange 2003....could someone confirm the type of mail recipients there are?

I thought they were

Mailbox enabled user: A user with an AD account and a local Exchange mailbox
Mail enabled user: A user with an AD account but an external SMTP address
Mail enabled contact: Someone with no AD account, but they appear in the GAL with their SMTP address so that our users can email them

Have I got this/the terminology correct? Have I missed any?

Would be grateful for advise!

LVL 3
kam_ukAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
Hypercat (Deb)Connect With a Mentor Commented:
You are correct as far as the list of "mail-enabled" types of users.  A contact is either just a contact, or a mail-enabled contact.  You can add the vendor as a mail-enabled contact, then add the contact to the distribution list.  This should work for your scenario.
0
 
Mike KlineConnect With a Mentor Commented:
You got it Kam!!
A Mail enabled user can receive messages only at that external e-mail address. The mail enabled user doesn't have an exchange mailbox on your exchange infrastructure so as you correctly identified a mail enabled user has an account in Active Directory but no Exchange mailbox.  
 
Thanks
Mike
 
 
0
 
december41991Connect With a Mentor Commented:
You are right !!!

Just change the last one :
Contact: Someone with no AD account, but they appear in the GAL with their SMTP address so that our users can email them.

Conatct has to be mail enabled , have you seen a contact who is not mail enabled.


They are there just to be in the GAL and for adding to DL in a situation like yours.


0
Easily Design & Build Your Next Website

Squarespace’s all-in-one platform gives you everything you need to express yourself creatively online, whether it is with a domain, website, or online store. Get started with your free trial today, and when ready, take 10% off your first purchase with offer code 'EXPERTS'.

 
kam_ukAuthor Commented:
Thanks guys, just picking up on hypercat's comment;

"A contact is either just a contact, or a mail-enabled contact"

Ok - I understand what a mail-enabled contact is, but I didn't know there was such a thing as a non mail-enabled contact? What would be the purpose of this?
0
 
december41991Commented:
Even I would like to know ....
0
 
december41991Commented:
I just tried creating a contact without a email address .. I was able to ... not sure what it will be usewd for .. my guess .. when the tme comes you can exchange task it and establish a email addres

or there are situations where contacts are created by a different team and exchange admins establish email address...
 :)
0
 
december41991Commented:
I just tried creating a contact without a email address .. I was able to ... not sure what it will be usewd for .. my guess .. when the tme comes you can exchange task it and establish a email addres

or there are situations where contacts are created by a different team and exchange admins establish email address...
 :)
0
 
Hypercat (Deb)Commented:
A non-mail-enabled contact could be used just for other contact information such as mailing address, telephone, etc.  I've never actually used it, but I suppose it could be useful in an organization where you wanted to supply that type of information about people in another geographical location, for example, but you didn't want your users to be able to send email to those people...or something like that.  I agree it doesn't seem too logical, but someone somewhere must have had a reason for it.
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.