[Webinar] Streamline your web hosting managementRegister Today

x
?
Solved

Uninstalling CA eTrustITM 8.0 with msiexec, how to suppress question about reboot

Posted on 2009-04-03
3
Medium Priority
?
1,747 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-14
Hi,
I am working on an upgrade script that will uninstall eTrustITM ver 8.0 and install 8.1. The script works perfectly but i get a question during uninstall asking if i want to reboot now or later. It looks like it is eTrustITM asking the question and not msiexec. Does anyone know how i can suppress the question regarding reboot.


Here is the script (i am using kix):
 
CASE $eTrustITMver = "8.0"
shell 'MsiExec.exe /qbn /X{A73227F9-C4B0-4018-B0B0-4DCAF791A29E} /q /norestart' 
shell 'MsiExec.exe /qbn /X{847501DF-07C0-4691-B04A-893929F108AE} /q /norestart'
shell '\\server\CA\CA_INST\English\Bin\Win32\install.exe /s /n INO_ICFFILE=\\server\CA\CA_INST\English\Bin\Win32\inoc6.icf'
 
Everything works fine exept the question regarding reboot now or later.

Open in new window

0
Comment
Question by:Reset_
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 3

Accepted Solution

by:
Reset_ earned 0 total points
ID: 24069675
I solved it!

I tried 1000 variants of the msiexec commands, finally i realized that the placement for the /qn switch made a difference. I had it in the end, but when i placed it before the /x (uninstall switch it all worked fine).
shell 'MsiExec.exe /qn /X{847501DF-07C0-4691-B04A-893929F108AE}' ;iGateway
shell 'MsiExec.exe /qn /X{A73227F9-C4B0-4018-B0B0-4DCAF791A29E}' ;eTrustITM

Open in new window

0
 
LVL 40

Assisted Solution

by:Vadim Rapp
Vadim Rapp earned 2000 total points
ID: 24183685
Actually, looking at what you posted first, it looks like it was evem the position, but the switch itself. You had it twice : /qbn and /q . Quite likely /q was overriding /qbn, and /q without anything following is incorrect; on the other hand, /qbn is also incorrect: should be either /qn, or /qb .
0
 
LVL 3

Author Comment

by:Reset_
ID: 24296199
You are quite right that both the double /q switch and the qbn switch are wrong. I realized that too when i read the help text for msiexec at technet. I skipped the /q switch in front on an early stage when i had the trouble as i realized that there would be no point in having it twice. The reason why it was so clear that the position mattered was because i was using the same sentence when i solved it as i was when it failed (the sentence i have posted above as solution). i moved the switch in front and it worked, that was the only change i made from the not working sentence to the working.
0

Featured Post

Get your problem seen by more experts

Be seen. Boost your question’s priority for more expert views and faster solutions

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Q&A with Course Creator, Mark Lassoff, on the importance of HTML5 in the career of a modern-day developer.
Originally, this post was published on Monitis Blog, you can check it here . In business circles, we sometimes hear that today is the “age of the customer.” And so it is. Thanks to the enormous advances over the past few years in consumer techno…
With the power of JIRA, there's an unlimited number of ways you can customize it, use it and benefit from it. With that in mind, there's bound to be things that I wasn't able to cover in this course. With this summary we'll look at some places to go…
Video by: Mark
This lesson goes over how to construct ordered and unordered lists and how to create hyperlinks.
Suggested Courses

591 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question