?
Solved

Stop WSUS client Updates

Posted on 2009-04-04
5
Medium Priority
?
338 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-04
Two .net service pack updates have been accidently published from our wsus 2.0 server to over 4000 clients. I need to stop the updates downloading as the network card on the server is running at 100% due to the large amount of traffic and the server is unable to be used. I have disabled the lan and changed the updates to not approved but as soon as I enable the lan connections clients continue to download the updates. How can I stop this. I don't even know how to identify the updates on the server to manually delete the files \folder. server is running 2003 web edition and clients are xp pro.
0
Comment
Question by:jwiddo
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
5 Comments
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:Kentrix70
ID: 24066886
If you have active directory, you can use this policy

Computer Configuration\Adminnistrative Templates\Windows Components\Windows Update

to prevent the pc's from downloading the updates.

You can then gropu your pc's in different logical groups, and change the same
policy settings for them but reverse to enable wsus updates to them.

In that way you can controle how many pc's are updating in the same time.

Afterwards you might do the same by using more than one profile on the wsus server
so that you can control it better in the future.
0
 
LVL 47

Expert Comment

by:Donald Stewart
ID: 24067745
I would use group policy to manage the bandwidth used by updates, You most likely will experience this in the future otherwise. You can configure Bits to control your bandwidth.



Appendix E: Configuring BITS 2.0 and 3.0 for Download Performance
0
 
LVL 56

Expert Comment

by:McKnife
ID: 24083269
You need to disapprove the updates. So list all recently approved updates and filter for .net/dotnet
If needed, then stewart's BITS will be the way.
So next time, look at the update sizes, too. Non-security fixes might be very large.
0
 
LVL 47

Expert Comment

by:Donald Stewart
ID: 24083393
Correction, the updates would have to be declined    : ^ )
0
 

Accepted Solution

by:
jwiddo earned 0 total points
ID: 24182755
Managed to solve issue by changing update to non approval and running wsusutil deleteunneededrevisions.
0

Featured Post

Need protection from advanced malware attacks?

Look no further than WatchGuard's Total Security Suite, providing defense in depth against today's most headlining attacks like Petya 2.0 and WannaCry. Keep your organization out of the news with protection from known and unknown threats.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

SHARE your personal details only on a NEED to basis. Take CHARGE and SECURE your IDENTITY. How do I then PROTECT myself and stay in charge of my own Personal details (and) - MY own WAY...
Our Group Policy work started with Small Business Server in 2000. Microsoft gave us an excellent OU and GPO model in subsequent SBS editions that utilized WMI filters, OU linking, and VBS scripts. These are some of experiences plus our spending a lo…
Two types of users will appreciate AOMEI Backupper Pro: 1 - Those with PCIe drives (and haven't found cloning software that works on them). 2 - Those who want a fast clone of their boot drive (no re-boots needed) and it can clone your drive wh…
NetCrunch network monitor is a highly extensive platform for network monitoring and alert generation. In this video you'll see a live demo of NetCrunch with most notable features explained in a walk-through manner. You'll also get to know the philos…
Suggested Courses
Course of the Month11 days, 1 hour left to enroll

770 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question