• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 10807
  • Last Modified:

Fortigate FTPS - 425 Can't open data connection.

We have just replaced our ISA Firewall Cluster with two Fortigate 110C units.

The FTP server runs FileZilla FTP Server, configured to use FTPS (TCP 990) as the command port and 50000-51000 as the data ports.

I have setup the Virtual IP's to forward the 990 traffic to the server and created a firewall policy to allow 990,50000-51000.

When making a client connection I get the following:
Status:      Connecting to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:990...
Status:      Connection established, initializing TLS...
Status:      Verifying certificate...
Status:      TLS/SSL connection established, waiting for welcome message...
Response:      220-FileZilla Server version 0.9.27 beta
Response:      220 Welcome to xyz server
Command:      USER myusername
Response:      331 Password required for myusername
Command:      PASS **************
Response:      230 Logged on
Command:      PBSZ 0
Response:      200 PBSZ=0
Command:      PROT P
Response:      200 Protection level set to P
Status:      Connected
Status:      Retrieving directory listing...
Command:      PWD
Response:      257 "/" is current directory.
Command:      TYPE I
Response:      200 Type set to I
Command:      PASV
Response:      227 Entering Passive Mode (xxx,xxx,xxx,xxx,195,247)
Command:      LIST
Response:      425 Can't open data connection.
Error:      Failed to retrieve directory listing

From that log I can determine that the connection to the server via port 990 is successful and authenticates however the client can not connect to the data port 50167 (195*256+247)

Now what I am assuming is that the Fortigates are not allowing the connection because the data ports are not forwarded and I somehow have to tell the fortigate to allow the connection through (i thought it might be NAT so I enabled this option on the firewall policy but this made no difference) and i don't think forwarding the whole 50000-51000 range is the correct method either.

I also tried applying a protection profile that has no Anti-Virus etc applied to it but still didn't fix it.

Does anyone have any ideas where I'm going wrong?

I know FTPS is ugly and it wasn't my choice but I have to get it working none the less. It worked fine with the ISA cluster (YUCK!) so what the hell was ISA doing that I need to tell the fortigates to do?
0
ZeeBOBNZ
Asked:
ZeeBOBNZ
1 Solution
 
giltjrCommented:
You will need to configure the Fortigate to allow inbound traffic to the ftp server for the whole port range.  If you are doing a static one-to-one NAT for the ftp server that should be all you need to do.  If you are doing port mapping, then you need to port map the whole range.

Also is the IP address in the 227 message actually reachable by the client?

If not:

Does the server and client support extended passive?   If so, use that.

If the client or the server does not support extended passive, then you will need to configure Filezilla to use the public IP address for passive connections.
0
 
ZeeBOBNZAuthor Commented:
Hi,

Yes the 227 message does have the correct IP address.
I understand what you mean about the one-to-one NAT I just don't know how to configure this on the Fortigates...

Thanks
0
 
giltjrCommented:
Which model do you have and what is the firmware/software level?
0
Improved Protection from Phishing Attacks

WatchGuard DNSWatch reduces malware infections by detecting and blocking malicious DNS requests, improving your ability to protect employees from phishing attacks. Learn more about our newest service included in Total Security Suite today!

 
ZeeBOBNZAuthor Commented:
Fortigate 110C

FG110C-3.00-FW-build733-081122
0
 
giltjrCommented:
It appears that Fortigate uses virtual IP (VIP) to setup static one-to-one NAT:

http://kc.forticare.com/default.asp?id=1765&SID=&Lang=1

Does this help?
0
 
ZeeBOBNZAuthor Commented:
Thanks for the link, i must have read that article about 10 times and missed the crucial instruction.

Thanks!
0
 
aijazansCommented:
Dear all,

I am facing similar problem on my network.i Have done the above workaround but still facing the same problem..

Please help me
0
 
giltjrCommented:
You will need to open your own question.
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Increase Security & Decrease Risk with NSPM Tools

Analyst firm, Enterprise Management Associates (EMA) reveals significant benefits to enterprises when using Network Security Policy Management (NSPM) solutions, while organizations without, experienced issues including non standard security policies and failed cloud migrations

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now