Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of MFollwerk
MFollwerk

asked on

How to get a Canon IR2200i to store documents on a Windows server 2008

Hello everyone,

at our office we have a Canon IR2200i that is supposed to "deliver" scanned documents to a server by storing them on a SMB share. When the share was hosted on Windows server 2003R2, this was merely a matter of disabling SMB signing on the server, since (like so many "professional" copiers) the Canon cannot handle that apparently.

However, since we switched to Windows Server 2008, I cannot get the Canon to store anything on an SMB share, even when I disable SMB signing completely in the domain controllers policy. The copier only produces the less than useful message "FEHLER" ("error").
The error message is displayed immediately after scanning, so a name resolution problem is unlikely (too little delay).

If anyone had an idea either how to make it work or how to get the machine to display a more meaningful error message, it would be greatly appreciated.

The server, in its event log, records a failed logon with the following data (this is for a logon attempt including the domain name, i.e. with a username of "pps\t.test"):
--------
Security ID: NULL SID
Account Name: PPS\T.TEST
Account Domain:

Workstation name: PPS\T.TEST
--------

Especially the reported workstation name sends shivers down my spine. Seems like the copier uses a pretty "free" interpretation of what information to deliver. In its network settings, its name is configured as "canon" btw.

In the unit's address book, I used the following settings to access the server (known to work, tested with Liunx smbclient):
---------
server: \\server-01\Benutzer
Path: \t.test\Dokumente\Scans
User: pps\t.test
Password: ************
---------------
The canon has SMB support switched on; TCP/IP networking is configured by DHCP and working.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of jrtec
jrtec
Flag of Portugal image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of MFollwerk
MFollwerk

ASKER

Hello jrtec,

thanks for the suggestions. I am currently out of office, but will test them later today and let you know the results.
Hello again,
I now had time to test it all out. You are right btw in your assumption that I changed the "domain controllers" policy, not the normal domain policy. I even completely disabled SMB signing (not even optional) - no effect.
I followed your other suggestions and lowered the LAN Manager Authentication Level (down to the lowes possible) and even did a reboot to be absolutely certain that the settings were applied.

No effect, unfortunately. :-(

I checked the event log on the Windows server and it says "unknown user name or wrong password" (or simliar, I have to translate it from German) when it rejects the connect. I have quadruple-checkde username and password of course. You even enter them in cleartext on the Canon, so there is little room for error.

I am on it further.
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Sorry, Forget this question since have already tested.
Did you check if you can access the shared folder on the server from another computer on the network using that username and password?
Yes, I did check that. Other Windows- and Linux-systems can access the folder fine using the same credentials. I'll try the hint about the username and domain name after the holiday (which is friday and monday here in Germany) and let you know the results. Thanks for your help so far. Your input is much appreciated.
just to let you know, after lots of debugging and browsing logs, I have given up on this. It turned out that the copier sends completely wring credentials (i.e. user name where domain name should be etc). While Windows Server 2003 apparently gets along with this, neither Linux Samba servers nor windows Server 2008 do. I consider this machine broken by design.
I nevertheless accept your solution, jrtec, because in my experience it works for many other machines and is nicely put together.
It didn't work in the end, but the suggested measures work for many other machines. The Canon is most definitely bugged beyond hope.