Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people, just like you, are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
Solved

XP gui slows down, CPU not pegged. Multi XLS on XP

Posted on 2009-04-07
4
300 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-01
I am trying to spot a bottleneck in a system.  Here is a summary of it:

Dell Precision T3400
core2 quad Q9450
4GB RAM installed
32bit XP Pro sp3
standard SATA drive
office 2003 sp3

I am monitoring the standard items that come up with perfmon--but with each CPU core monitored separately.  Disk time and memory pages per second are 0 most the time with sparse spikes to 60 times per second. Nic isn't utilized much.  ~2 GB of free RAM.  We would stress out the machine by running multiple, complex Excel 2003 sheets.  After about a dozen sheets, the XP GUI (explorer.exe) starts running slow, the explorer process or any other process is not hogging CPU cycles.  All 4 cores are between 40 and 60%. It can take minutes for explorer to respond to mouse clicks on the task bar for example.  The sheets work fine.  Excel seems zippy.  Perhaps there's bottleneck somewhere that I didn't consider.  What might I look at?  Is there a way to monitor the front side bus?
0
Comment
Question by:pcrequest
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 28

Expert Comment

by:burrcm
ID: 24095045
RAM is running at effectively 100% if 2GB is free as 2 is all it will use. Set the 3GB switch per the instructions here to see if any improvement -

http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/server/PAE/PAEmem.mspx

Consider a 64 bit OS, pref Vista.

Chris B
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:pcrequest
ID: 24100175
I'll try the switch, however I should note XP only sees 3.00 GB RAM.  so 2/3 of the RAM is free.  And if RAM was all used up, shouldn't I see a lot of hdd thrashing show up in the memory and disk counters as sustained periods of highs in the graph?
0
 
LVL 28

Accepted Solution

by:
burrcm earned 500 total points
ID: 24105825
Doesn't matter if XP sees 3GB, if you read the link I posted - The virtual address space of processes and applications is still limited to 2 GB, unless the /3GB switch is used in the Boot.ini file.

So your RAM is maxed out and no doubt the swap file is getting a workout. This is why it is not happy. May even run better if you drop the RAM to 2GB, would have to try it to see how it went. XP cannot take full advantage of the quad core, you should upgrade.

Chris B
0

Featured Post

Enterprise Mobility and BYOD For Dummies

Like “For Dummies” books, you can read this in whatever order you choose and learn about mobility and BYOD; and how to put a competitive mobile infrastructure in place. Developed for SMBs and large enterprises alike, you will find helpful use cases, planning, and implementation.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article will guide you to convert a grid from a picture into Excel format using Microsoft OneNote and no other 3rd party application.
Today, still in the boom of Apple, PC's and products, nearly 50% of the computer users use Windows as graphical operating systems. If you are among those users who love windows, but are grappling to keep the system's hard drive optimized, then you s…
Graphs within dashboards are meant to be dynamic, representing data from a period of time that will change each time the dashboard is updated with new data. Rather than update each graph to point to a different set within a static set of data, t…
This Micro Tutorial will demonstrate on a Mac how to change the sort order for chart legend values and decrpyt the intimidating chart menu.

789 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question