Solved

XP gui slows down, CPU not pegged. Multi XLS on XP

Posted on 2009-04-07
4
302 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-01
I am trying to spot a bottleneck in a system.  Here is a summary of it:

Dell Precision T3400
core2 quad Q9450
4GB RAM installed
32bit XP Pro sp3
standard SATA drive
office 2003 sp3

I am monitoring the standard items that come up with perfmon--but with each CPU core monitored separately.  Disk time and memory pages per second are 0 most the time with sparse spikes to 60 times per second. Nic isn't utilized much.  ~2 GB of free RAM.  We would stress out the machine by running multiple, complex Excel 2003 sheets.  After about a dozen sheets, the XP GUI (explorer.exe) starts running slow, the explorer process or any other process is not hogging CPU cycles.  All 4 cores are between 40 and 60%. It can take minutes for explorer to respond to mouse clicks on the task bar for example.  The sheets work fine.  Excel seems zippy.  Perhaps there's bottleneck somewhere that I didn't consider.  What might I look at?  Is there a way to monitor the front side bus?
0
Comment
Question by:pcrequest
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 28

Expert Comment

by:burrcm
ID: 24095045
RAM is running at effectively 100% if 2GB is free as 2 is all it will use. Set the 3GB switch per the instructions here to see if any improvement -

http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/server/PAE/PAEmem.mspx

Consider a 64 bit OS, pref Vista.

Chris B
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:pcrequest
ID: 24100175
I'll try the switch, however I should note XP only sees 3.00 GB RAM.  so 2/3 of the RAM is free.  And if RAM was all used up, shouldn't I see a lot of hdd thrashing show up in the memory and disk counters as sustained periods of highs in the graph?
0
 
LVL 28

Accepted Solution

by:
burrcm earned 500 total points
ID: 24105825
Doesn't matter if XP sees 3GB, if you read the link I posted - The virtual address space of processes and applications is still limited to 2 GB, unless the /3GB switch is used in the Boot.ini file.

So your RAM is maxed out and no doubt the swap file is getting a workout. This is why it is not happy. May even run better if you drop the RAM to 2GB, would have to try it to see how it went. XP cannot take full advantage of the quad core, you should upgrade.

Chris B
0

Featured Post

Guide to Performance: Optimization & Monitoring

Nowadays, monitoring is a mixture of tools, systems, and codes—making it a very complex process. And with this complexity, comes variables for failure. Get DZone’s new Guide to Performance to learn how to proactively find these variables and solve them before a disruption occurs.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

For both online and offline retail, the cross-channel business is the most recent pattern in the B2C trade space.
Excel can be a tricky bit of software to get your head around. Whilst you’ll be able to eventually get to grips with the basic understanding of how to get by, there are a few Excel tips that not everybody will even know about let alone know how to d…
This Micro Tutorial will demonstrate on a Mac how to change the sort order for chart legend values and decrpyt the intimidating chart menu.
Many functions in Excel can make decisions. The most simple of these is the IF function: it returns a value depending on whether a condition you describe is true or false. Once you get the hang of using the IF function, you will find it easier to us…

733 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question