jjoz
asked on
Using Shared Dell PowerVault MD3000 SAN with iSCSI for more than 2 Servers running VMWareESXi
Hi All,
I'm in the process of getting new Virtualization Technology working in my office using:
2x Dell PowerEDGE 2950-III each installed with iSCSI Controller accessing the following SAN
1x the Dell PowerVault MD3000 (10x 300 GB 15k rpm SAS)
The VMWare ESXi is installed in an internal USB to load 4x VMs which is running SOLARIS ( serving as Project, homes, SAMBA file server and Source code repository and compiling the project source code as build server too.)
5x Windows Server 2003 which performing as Application Server running Apache Tomcat.
And I wonder if there is any performance benefits in implementing the Shared SAN for those two physical Server through iSCSI as opposed with Fibre Channel.
I am aware that FC is faster and more expensive but in this case I wont run any VM with DB server on it.
shall i go down in the path of having iSCSI or stick with the FC considering the SAN is running on 15k rpm SAS used by 2 ESXi server.
Please share some thought in regards to this configuration.
Thanks,
I'm in the process of getting new Virtualization Technology working in my office using:
2x Dell PowerEDGE 2950-III each installed with iSCSI Controller accessing the following SAN
1x the Dell PowerVault MD3000 (10x 300 GB 15k rpm SAS)
The VMWare ESXi is installed in an internal USB to load 4x VMs which is running SOLARIS ( serving as Project, homes, SAMBA file server and Source code repository and compiling the project source code as build server too.)
5x Windows Server 2003 which performing as Application Server running Apache Tomcat.
And I wonder if there is any performance benefits in implementing the Shared SAN for those two physical Server through iSCSI as opposed with Fibre Channel.
I am aware that FC is faster and more expensive but in this case I wont run any VM with DB server on it.
shall i go down in the path of having iSCSI or stick with the FC considering the SAN is running on 15k rpm SAS used by 2 ESXi server.
Please share some thought in regards to this configuration.
Thanks,
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
alright, I'm looking to get 2x DUAL port Gigabit Ethernet so that each server can have 2 GB of Bandwidth into it.
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
OK, in this case If I'd like to configure the Server like this:
2x Gigabit Ethernet on Server1 - connect to HP Procurve Gigabit Switch
2x Gigabit Ethernet on Server2 - connect to HP Procurve Gigabit Switch
Dell PowerVault MD3000 - connect to HP Procurve Gigabit Switch
and then the Procurve Gigabit connects to the other Gigabit Switch using 2 uplink cable so that the rest of the office could access the Virtualized Servers.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
great,
thanks nappy !
thanks nappy !
ASKER
thanks for your help sir !
ASKER
Excellent. Thanks for the followup.
ASKER
Again, in this case I'd like to simplify the diagram again so that i can use 2xdirect patch cable connection to the SAN from each server and just leave the production line access one cable to the unmanaged switch while those two pairs of the SAN-Servers running on it's own subnet
Please find the following final diagram:
thanks for all of your comments Nappy.
iSCSI-SAN.jpg
Please find the following final diagram:
thanks for all of your comments Nappy.
iSCSI-SAN.jpg
ASKER
Nappy,
This is the updated diagram by creating a separate Subnet for the SAN without the use of managed switch.
please let me know your comment or shall i start another thread.
Thanks,
iSCSI-SAN.jpg
This is the updated diagram by creating a separate Subnet for the SAN without the use of managed switch.
please let me know your comment or shall i start another thread.
Thanks,
iSCSI-SAN.jpg
ASKER