Solved

Does NAT break IPSec?

Posted on 2009-04-08
3
390 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-06
I am trying to find a way to securely handle Microsoft Active Directory replication as well as other Microsoft networking traffic between 2 Windows Server 2003 systems.  Ordinarily I would set up a site to site VPN using SonicWall or NetGear devices.  However, I can't in this situation because one of my servers is a virtual server that is hosted at Triple8 networks.  Thus, I have no way of deploying my own hardware based VPN.

I thought the best way to do this would be to set up IPSec Rules and Security Associations to handle all traffic between the 2 systems.  When the policies and rules are disabled, I can successfully ping back and forth between the 2 systems which tells me that I have successfully set up the firewall rules on the side that I can control.

When I enable the policies and launch ping from the command prompt, I just see the message NEGOTIATING SECURITY over and over.  When I examine the logs on both sides, I see several 541, 542, and 543 messages indicating successful starting and ending of security associations.  I have actually tried numerous systems including Windows XP with different firewalls and networks and observed similar results.

The only system with its own direct public ip address is my virtual server at Triple 8.  The other systems that I have tried are all behind firewalls and are NAT'd.

Any thoughts as to why I cannot get this to actually work? Is there a better way to accomplish my goal?

Thank you,

Angela
0
Comment
Question by:amozart
3 Comments
 
LVL 4

Accepted Solution

by:
dj_relentless earned 125 total points
ID: 24104530
It can work from behind nat but not all nat's are equal. I've seen to work and not work depending on the hardware.
So in your situation you could put a test server on the dmz of your network and test it. Then at least you will know which side is causing the problem.
0
 
LVL 4

Assisted Solution

by:StefanKittel
StefanKittel earned 125 total points
ID: 24104630
Hello,

in general NAT modifies the destination and/or source of the packet so IPSec throws the packet away because it is modified.
Many NAT-router have a IPSEC-passthrough. But not all and not for all situations.

Because you can't remove or modify the NAT-Router your possibilites are limited.

May be you can use a different vpn software to connect. maybe openvpn.

Stefan
0

Featured Post

How to run any project with ease

Manage projects of all sizes how you want. Great for personal to-do lists, project milestones, team priorities and launch plans.
- Combine task lists, docs, spreadsheets, and chat in one
- View and edit from mobile/offline
- Cut down on emails

Join & Write a Comment

It is only natural that we all want our PCs to be in good working order, improved system performance, so that is exactly how programs are advertised to entice. They say things like:            •      PC crashes? Get registry cleaner to repair it!    …
Learn about cloud computing and its benefits for small business owners.
Get a first impression of how PRTG looks and learn how it works.   This video is a short introduction to PRTG, as an initial overview or as a quick start for new PRTG users.
This video demonstrates how to create an example email signature rule for a department in a company using CodeTwo Exchange Rules. The signature will be inserted beneath users' latest emails in conversations and will be displayed in users' Sent Items…

706 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

18 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now